Buying Options
Print List Price: | $19.00 |
Kindle Price: | $14.99 Save $4.01 (21%) |
Sold by: | Random House LLC Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Art of Maneuver: Maneuver Warfare Theory and Airland Battle Kindle Edition
Price | New from | Used from |
Praise for The Art of Maneuver
“Robert Leonhard is one of a number of prominent young military writers, like Daniel Bolger, John Antal, Bruce Gudmundsson, and Harold Raugh, whose work appears regularly in military journals. The Art of Maneuver is his first book, and military readers will appreciate his grasp of military history, forceful analysis, and adventurous writing style. . . .This is an important book which deserves the attention of military professionals. . . . Leonhard deserves credit for a hard-nosed attempt to evaluate U.S. strengths and weaknesses as a basis for further improvements in service doctrine, training, and force development. . . . In the celebratory aftermath of a ‘good war,’ such honest self-appraisal is both healthy and encouraging.”—Parameters
“This commentary on warfighting is of value to any student of warfare, especially with our current emphasis on the importance of joint and combined operations. . . . This is an intelligent, thorough, and well-researched work. The author’s knowledge is demonstrated amply throughout, and his ability to express maneuver warfare concepts in simple terms is unequaled. . . . An important milestone in the evolution of the maneuver style of warfare. Read it!”—Marine Corps Gazette
“Leonhard . . . has combined military expertise and historical analysis for an entertaining and fresh look at maneuver warfare. . . . In one volume, the author offers trenchant, exciting, and masterful perspective on victory in modern warfare.”—National Defense
“Robert Leonhard makes an outstanding contribution to our understanding of maneuver warfare in this book. . . . Our leaders, junior and senior alike, should find this book well worth reading and contemplating.”—ARMOR Magazine
“An important contribution to the on-going reassessment of U.S. Army doctrine . . . A must for anyone seriously interested in the future of Army doctrine—and the Army. . . . Further, it is an excellent starting point for young officers to begin their lifelong study of the art of war.”—ARMY Magazine
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPresidio Press
- Publication dateJanuary 16, 2009
- File size4859 KB
![]() |
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“This commentary on warfighting is of value to any student of warfare, especially with our current emphasis on the importance of joint and combined operations. . . . This is an intelligent, thorough, and well-researched work. The author’s knowledge is demonstrated amply throughout, and his ability to express maneuver warfare concepts in simple terms is unequaled. . . . An important milestone in the evolution of the maneuver style of warfare. Read it!”—Marine Corps Gazette
“Leonhard . . . has combined military expertise and historical analysis for an entertaining and fresh look at maneuver warfare. . . . In one volume, the author offers trenchant, exciting, and masterful perspective on victory in modern warfare.”—National Defense
“Robert Leonhard makes an outstanding contribution to our understanding of maneuver warfare in this book. . . . Our leaders, junior and senior alike, should find this book well worth reading and contemplating.”—ARMOR Magazine
“An important contribution to the on-going reassessment of U.S. Army doctrine . . . A must for anyone seriously interested in the future of Army doctrine—and the Army. . . . Further, it is an excellent starting point for young officers to begin their lifelong study of the art of war.”—ARMY Magazine
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
FRAMEWORK FOR MANEUVER
The best strategy is always to be very strong.
—Clausewitz, On War
INTRODUCTION: THE FLOWERY WARS
The ancient Aztecs worshiped, among others, Huitzicoatl, the storm god. One of the most important aspects of their worship was to provide Huitzicoatl with his favorite nectar—human blood. In order to satisfy the god’s grisly thirst, the Aztecs employed a ritualistic method of fighting other tribes known as “the flowery wars.”1 The purpose behind the flowery wars was not simply defeat of the enemy per se; the Aztecs were motivated to glorify and focus upon the bloodshed that resulted from battle. If possible the enemy was not killed outright but rather captured, so that later his heart could be ritually cut out and offered to Huitzicoatl. And since all participants basically worshiped the same gods and viewed the flowery wars from the same perspective, there was a sort of cooperation, rather than competition, associated with the fighting. Once challenge had been officially offered, both sides’ priests would meet to arrange for battle on the most auspicious day. Each side was meticulous about giving the enemy the best opportunity to prepare for the battle. It was unthinkable to concentrate instead upon defeating the enemy, imposing one’s will through force of arms, and ending the fight on favorable terms at the least expense of men, materiel, and time. To win and win cheaply would have been regarded as blasphemy—selfishly withholding the proper blood sacrifice.
Thankfully, Huitzicoatl is dead—or is he? Can we perhaps detect his sanguinary presence in our army today? Can we track his bloody footprints along the halls of our training institutions? Do we hear his priests chanting as we listen to the latest versions of our fighting doctrine being preached? Whether for the sake of deities, doctrinaires, or just grand old traditions, there appears to be an immovable fixation upon attrition theory within the U.S. Army, at times approaching the madness of the Aztecs’ flowery wars in its application. The priorities found in doctrinal manuals, in schools, in combat units, and most important, in the souls of our leaders often appear to be aimed at destroying rather than defeating, at fighting fairly rather than stealing every possible advantage over the enemy, and at pursuing perfection in method rather than obtaining decisive results. Virtually every effort—whether designing new vehicles, improving weapons or munitions, developing new tactical concepts, or training officers—seems bent on fighting toe-to-toe with a prepared enemy, leaning into his strength, and outlasting him rather than outthinking him.
This book is aimed at investigating these trends: defining them, exposing their weaknesses, and breaking the cognitive logjam that threatens to block creative approaches to developing effective fighting doctrine. There is a wealth of innovation and energy within our combat-arms leaders that will never be channeled effectively under the constraints imposed by our current doctrine and institutionalized inertia. This study is designed to offer some new thoughts and to inject new directions in our doctrinal developments. To accomplish this task in a way that is at once accurate, inspiring, interesting (even entertaining), and—most of all—useful to friends and foes of the concept alike, I have attempted to define the term “maneuver warfare,” compare it to its theoretical antithesis (attrition theory), and then evaluate our current and evolving doctrine in the light of maneuver theory.
THE CHALLENGE TO DEFINE
When Antoine-Henri Jomini wrote his Art of War, he came under attack by his contemporaries for his presumptuous dogmatism. His attempts to provide concrete and useful definitions and concepts of military theory enraged many of his peers. In reply he wrote:
I hope … I could not be accused of wishing to make this art a mechanical routine, nor of pretending on the contrary that the reading of a single chapter of principles is able to give, all at once, the talent of conducting an army. In all the arts, as in all the situations of life, knowledge and skill are two altogether different things, and if one often succeed through skill alone, it is never but the union of the two that constitutes a superior man and assures complete success.
It seems that throughout all walks of life, and particularly within the military profession, there persists a dislike, even a fear, of definitions. Whether because a clear definition of a term or concept immediately begs questions about the exception, or because Western man’s love of pluralism causes him to be wary of dogma, one finds that to define a military term is to create an argument. Within the U.S. Army there seems to be a recurring trend first to organize, categorize, and lend specificity to the field manuals and other publications that articulate our doctrine, and then to retreat from such assertions in the name of encouraging innovative thinking. I recall the sense of frustration I had as a young infantry lieutenant, hungry for knowledge but unable to find anything substantial in my “how-to-fight” field manuals beyond vague generalities and buzzwords that left me unprepared for the complexities of mechanized operations. Then again, as a captain I was pleased to find revised manuals that offered well-organized, specific tactical procedures for small units. I have observed the cycle continue ever since: an attempt to articulate specific and useful ideas followed by a cautious retreat into vagueness.
But without some established definitions and principles, a journey into military theory is impossible. Therefore, this chapter is devoted to defining terms and concepts to be used throughout the remainder of the book. We shall progress in the course of four chapters to the objective of specifying from the perspective of both military history and modern theory what the term “maneuver warfare” means and what it doesn’t mean. It is necessary to prepare for our examination of the subject by first establishing a framework for discussion. I have drawn upon many sources for this chapter, and in some instances I will suggest some new ideas. --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.
Product details
- ASIN : B001QAP3JG
- Publisher : Presidio Press (January 16, 2009)
- Publication date : January 16, 2009
- Language : English
- File size : 4859 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 328 pages
- Page numbers source ISBN : 0891415327
- Lending : Not Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #635,613 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #585 in Military Strategy History (Kindle Store)
- #2,028 in Military Strategy History (Books)
- #2,537 in Business Leadership
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Lieutenant Colonel (Retired) Robert Leonhard served in the US Army for 24 years as an infantry officer, combat developer, and war planner. Currently he serves on the principal professional staff of The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland as a research analyst specializing in irregular warfare.
Colonel Leonhard earned a BA in History from Columbus University, a Masters in International Relations from Troy State University, a Masters of Military Arts and Sciences from the US Army Command and General Staff College, and a Doctorate in American History from West Virginia University.
He lives in West Virginia with his wife, the novelist Suzanne Elizabeth Leonhard, and their children. He is an avid wargamer and chess player.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In short (and with the above caveats in mind), this work can only be characterized as a huge disappointment. There are, in my view, two fatal flaws in this work. First, at least half the text is taken up with Col. Leonhard's personal rantings about shortcomings in Army training, doctrine, AirLand battle, etc. In particular, he repeatedly rants about AirLand battle doctrine is flawed. By the 27th time he states this, I think the reader gets the picture. One of the other reviewers states that this book is a tough read, but contains a great deal of info. I agree with this assessment, but it is a tough read because it it poorly written. The prose could have been tightened up, and more than half the discussion in the book removed as irrelevant.
Second, his conclusions often contradict his general thesis, or in several cases his conclusions really leave more questions than answers. He spends several hundred pages pointing out the flaws in the (then current - published in 1991) US Army Airland Battle, then as a case study talks about the invasion of Panama in 1989 and describes it as a great success for maneuver warfare. As an example of the latter phenomenon (answers versus questions), he goes to great length to explain the historical development of AirLand battle and how it was a response to the Soviet threat to Western Europe. He then rails about the flaws of the AirLand battle (and attrition warfare in general) and the superiorities of maneuver warfare, but then he never addresses the fundamental issue of how NATO should stop a Warsaw Pact invasion of Western Europe within the maneuver warfare paradigm. He never proposes an alternative to the AirLand battle, only criticizes it because it veers from the maneuver warfare paradigm. He vaguely alludes to some type of offensive, pre-emptive action, but I'm not sure how successful this would have been against the huge Warsaw Pact army. In the end, Leonhard left me with the impression that the AirLand battle paradigm was probably the right one and that his rantings about maneuver warfare are greatly overblown.
The bottom line is that there is some good info in this book (hence the three stars), but it really isn't that well written or detailed in spite of some of the glowing reviews. I can't really recommend that anyone take the time to read it. Everything that I learned from this book can be discerned in about 10 minutes by reading the Wikipedia entry on maneuver warfare. I'm going to get Bill Lind's book and perhaps look around for some additional references to broaden my knowledge. This book is a real disappointment.
I am at the moment a private in the Army, and if I could I would build on what Leonhard has to say. But for now I simply recommend this book.
Leonhard found well the main principles of maneuver warfare. This material is very usefull when you are studying the maneuver warfare theories. You can compare Leonhard's theory with (Boyd, Fuller, Creveld, Lind)theories and find similarities and totally fresh ideas! I will warmly recommend this book for studying man warfare!
Waiting for man warfare theory to naval warfare reserch...
Toni
Top reviews from other countries


