Print List Price: | $19.95 |
Kindle Price: | $15.95 Save $4.00 (20%) |
Sold by: | JOHN WILEY AND SONS INC Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy 1st Edition, Kindle Edition
Price | New from | Used from |
A timely and accessible guide to 100 of the most infamous logical fallacies in Western philosophy, helping readers avoid and detect false assumptions and faulty reasoning
You’ll love this book or you’ll hate it. So, you’re either with us or against us. And if you’re against us then you hate books. No true intellectual would hate this book.
Ever decide to avoid a restaurant because of one bad meal? Choose a product because a celebrity endorsed it? Or ignore what a politician says because she’s not a member of your party? For as long as people have been discussing, conversing, persuading, advocating, proselytizing, pontificating, or otherwise stating their case, their arguments have been vulnerable to false assumptions and faulty reasoning. Drawing upon a long history of logical falsehoods and philosophical flubs, Bad Arguments demonstrates how misguided arguments come to be, and what we can do to detect them in the rhetoric of others and avoid using them ourselves.
Fallacies—or conclusions that don’t follow from their premise—are at the root of most bad arguments, but it can be easy to stumble into a fallacy without realizing it. In this clear and concise guide to good arguments gone bad, Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, and Michael Bruce take readers through 100 of the most infamous fallacies in Western philosophy, identifying the most common missteps, pitfalls, and dead-ends of arguments gone awry. Whether an instance of sunk costs, is ought, affirming the consequent, moving the goal post, begging the question, or the ever-popular slippery slope, each fallacy engages with examples drawn from contemporary politics, economics, media, and popular culture. Further diagrams and tables supplement entries and contextualize common errors in logical reasoning.
At a time in our world when it is crucial to be able to identify and challenge rhetorical half-truths, this bookhelps readers to better understand flawed argumentation and develop logical literacy. Unrivaled in its breadth of coverage and a worthy companion to its sister volume Just the Arguments (2011), Bad Arguments is an essential tool for undergraduate students and general readers looking to hone their critical thinking and rhetorical skills.
- ISBN-13978-1119167907
- Edition1st
- PublisherWiley-Blackwell
- Publication dateSeptember 28, 2018
- LanguageEnglish
- File size2157 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“…In view of the contemporary controversies surrounding many of the fundamental concepts of logic discussed, this synopsis is no mean feat, given the exacting formalities of the subject. As a helping hand to students new to critical thinking, the book is immensely successful and useful…”
--L. C. Archie, emeritus, Lander University
CHOICE April 2019
--This text refers to the paperback edition.From the Back Cover
You'll love this book or you'll hate it. So, you're either with us or against us. And if you're against us then you hate books. No true intellectual would hate this book.
Ever decide to avoid a restaurant because of one bad meal? Choose a product because a celebrity endorsed it? Or ignore what a politician says because she's not a member of your party? For as long as people have been discussing, conversing, persuading, advocating, proselytizing, pontificating, or otherwise stating their case, arguments have been vulnerable to false assumptions and faulty reasoning. Drawing upon a long history of logical falsehoods and philosophical flubs, Bad Arguments demonstrates how misguided arguments come to be, what we can do to detect them in the rhetoric of others, and how to avoid using them ourselves.
Fallacies – or conclusions that don't follow from their premises – are at the root of most bad arguments, but it can be easy to stumble into a fallacy without realizing it. In this clear and concise guide to good arguments gone bad, Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, and Michael Bruce take readers through 100 of the most infamous fallacies in Western philosophy, identifying the most common missteps, pitfalls, and dead-ends of argumentation. Whether an instance of sunk cost, is ought, affirming the consequent, moving the goal post, begging the question, or the ever-popular slippery slope, each fallacy is enriched by examples drawn from contemporary politics, economics, media, and popular culture, and is supplemented with useful diagrams and tables.
At a time in our world when it is crucial to be able to identify and challenge rhetorical half-truths, this book helps readers to better understand flawed argumentation and develop logical literacy. Unrivaled in its breadth of coverage and a worthy companion to its sister volume, Just the Arguments (2011), Bad Arguments is an essential tool for students and general readers looking to hone their critical thinking and rhetorical skills.
--This text refers to the paperback edition.About the Author
ROBERT ARP is an instructor of philosophy and a researcher for the US Army. He has published numerous books and articles in philosophy and other areas. More information about his work and research interests can be found on his website.
STEVEN BARBONE is an Associate Professor of philosophy at San Diego State University. He has published numerous articles and book chapters on Baruch Spinoza.
MICHAEL BRUCE works in the software industry in San Francisco. With Steven Barbone, he edited Just the Arguments (Wiley Blackwell, 2011). An avid researcher in the history of philosophy and psychology, he has been published widely and is an active blogger for Psychology Today.
--This text refers to the paperback edition.From the Inside Flap
You'll love this book or you'll hate it. So, you're either with us or against us. And if you're against us then you hate books. No true intellectual would hate this book.
Ever decide to avoid a restaurant because of one bad meal? Choose a product because a celebrity endorsed it? Or ignore what a politician says because she's not a member of your party? For as long as people have been discussing, conversing, persuading, advocating, proselytizing, pontificating, or otherwise stating their case, arguments have been vulnerable to false assumptions and faulty reasoning. Drawing upon a long history of logical falsehoods and philosophical flubs, Bad Arguments demonstrates how misguided arguments come to be, what we can do to detect them in the rhetoric of others, and how to avoid using them ourselves.
Fallacies – or conclusions that don't follow from their premises – are at the root of most bad arguments, but it can be easy to stumble into a fallacy without realizing it. In this clear and concise guide to good arguments gone bad, Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, and Michael Bruce take readers through 100 of the most infamous fallacies in Western philosophy, identifying the most common missteps, pitfalls, and dead-ends of argumentation. Whether an instance of sunk cost, is ought, affirming the consequent, moving the goal post, begging the question, or the ever-popular slippery slope, each fallacy is enriched by examples drawn from contemporary politics, economics, media, and popular culture, and is supplemented with useful diagrams and tables.
At a time in our world when it is crucial to be able to identify and challenge rhetorical half-truths, this book helps readers to better understand flawed argumentation and develop logical literacy. Unrivaled in its breadth of coverage and a worthy companion to its sister volume, Just the Arguments (2011), Bad Arguments is an essential tool for students and general readers looking to hone their critical thinking and rhetorical skills.
--This text refers to the paperback edition.Product details
- ASIN : B07JCK5CD8
- Publisher : Wiley-Blackwell; 1st edition (September 28, 2018)
- Publication date : September 28, 2018
- Language : English
- File size : 2157 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 428 pages
- Page numbers source ISBN : 1119167906
- Best Sellers Rank: #658,474 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #190 in Logic & Language Philosophy
- #689 in Philosophy of Logic & Language
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors
I am a philosopher by training with interests that include philosophy generally and philosophy and pop culture. I have published and taught in these areas and in other areas, too. See my website at robertarp.com. Thanks.
David LaRocca, Ph.D. has served as Visiting Assistant Professor in the Cinema Department at Binghamton University, Visiting Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the State University of New York College at Cortland, Visiting Scholar in the Department of English at Cornell University, and Lecturer in Screen Studies in the Department of Cinema, Photography, and Media Arts at the Roy H. Park School of Communications at Ithaca College. He studied philosophy, film, rhetoric, and religion at Buffalo, Berkeley, Vanderbilt, and at Harvard, where he was also Sinclair Kennedy Traveling Fellow in the United Kingdom. Among other books, he is the author of Emerson’s English Traits and the Natural History of Metaphor, and editor of Stanley Cavell’s Emerson’s Transcendental Etudes; The Bloomsbury Anthology of Transcendental Thought; The Philosophy of Charlie Kaufman; The Philosophy of War Films; The Philosophy of Documentary Film: Image, Sound, Fiction, Truth; The Thought of Stanley Cavell and Cinema: Turning Anew to the Ontology of Film a Half-Century after The World Viewed; Inheriting Stanley Cavell: Memories, Dreams, Reflections; and Movies with Stanley Cavell in Mind. More details at www.davidlarocca.org
Michael J. Muniz (Dallas, TX) is an Assistant Headmaster at Founders Classical Academy of Corinth. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Leadership at Dallas Baptist University. He has contributed to several volumes in the Pop Culture and Philosophy series from Open Court, Blackwell-Wiley, and Rowman & Littlefield. He is a national speaker at various pop culture conferences around the country, such as Comic-Con, Wonder Con, Myth Con, etc..., where he combines and presents his ideas regarding his passions for philosophy, education, the arts, and religion. When he is not busy writing and researching, he enjoys his time with his wife and two kids.
YouTube= https://www.youtube.com/channel/@philosophemes
Instagram= https://www.instagram.com/philosophemes/
Podcast= https://bpq.podbean.com/
Patreon= https://www.patreon.com/Frank_Scalambrino_PhD
Dr. Frank Scalambrino is a 21st-century philosopher from the United State of America. His philosophical writing reflects his concern to search the history of philosophy for puzzles and mysteries that have not been solved. His books, then, may be seen as providing a solution to philosophical puzzles that had not been solved prior to his efforts. He has written ten books, authored over fifty professional peer-reviewed publications, and taught over one hundred university-level courses, including graduate-level courses in both philosophy and psychology.
Before age 27 he founded a Community Mental Health Suicide Prevention Respite Unit and Clinical Intervention Center; he subsequently received awards from multiple mental health agencies across the local, county, and state levels of Ohio, and, in the same year, was inducted into Chi Sigma Iota, the international counseling honor society.
He has worked in various direct service provision and leadership capacities in mental health clinics, psychiatric hospitals, emergency rooms, and trauma centers (including the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center). As an undergraduate, he was the starting quarterback and a captain of the Kenyon College football team.
In determining his projects as an author, he believes:
“Empty is the word of that philosopher by whom no affliction of men is cured. For as there is no benefit in medicine if it does not treat the diseases of the body, so with philosophy, if it does not drive out the affliction of the soul.” ~Epicurus, "Fragment #54."
Heather L. Rivera works in the History and Social Sciences Department at Louisiana State University Shreveport; and is an independent philosophical writer who has interests in metaphysics, the Problem of Evil, and philosophy of mind. She has written numerous philosophy articles, and guest lectured at Suffolk County Community College on such topics as "Cindy Sherman's Film Stills," "Simulacra and Simulation by Jean Baudrillard," and "Inception relating to Rene Descartes's Meditation on First Philosophy." She has given lectures annually on Evil, Pop Culture, and Philosophy at the Long Island Philosophical Society Conferences At Suffolk County Community College, Molloy College, and St. John's University as an invited lecturer.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author also kinds of misses the point here. The guns have always been with us, so what has changed? One possibility is they have become more deadly. Another is the culture has changed, and more people have gone to the dark side.
There is a decent introduction that goes through the basics of assertions, truth & falsity, and inferences, followed by examples that briefly touches upon the fallacies which are elaborated in the subsequent entries. Each entry begins with a good quoted example, followed by analysis and other examples, and concluded with references for further reading.
Now days, books that describe themselves as "accessible" usually have some sort of more eye-catching font layout design and "info-graphics", which this does not, thus some may just open it up and immediately put it back down. It really seems more like a classroom text in visual presentation, though once you get beyond that it is a really great read.
However, it could be a bit more useful if there were a more analytical roadmap to the subsequent contents with classification and grouping of the various fallacies.
Also, the index is not very complete. For example, after reading about an argument based on "verbosity", I wanted to find it again, but that wonderful term is not in the index. Turns out it is indexed as "proof by verbosity" instead.
I highly recommend this book for those interested in these kinds of things, in spite of the drawbacks.
Top reviews from other countries


