Beyond the Law

 (1,151)
4.11 h 29 min2019X-Ray16+
Steven Seagal, DMX & Johnny Messner star in this action-packed thriller about one man's quest for justice. When a former detective learns of the murder of his son, he must take on the ruthless local mob in his mission for revenge.
Directors
James Cullen Bressack
Starring
DMXSteven SeagalJohnny Messner
Genres
DramaAction
Subtitles
English [CC]
Audio languages
English

Watch for $0.00 with Prime

Add to Watchlist
Add to
Watchlist
By ordering or viewing, you agree to our Terms. Sold by Amazon.com Services LLC.
Write review

More details

Supporting actors
Bill Cobbs
Studio
Cinedigm
Purchase rights
Stream instantly Details
Format
Prime Video (streaming online video)
Devices
Available to watch on supported devices

Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars

1151 global ratings

  1. 63% of reviews have 5 stars
  2. 14% of reviews have 4 stars
  3. 11% of reviews have 3 stars
  4. 5% of reviews have 2 stars
  5. 7% of reviews have 1 stars
Sorted by:

Top reviews from the United States

ZjodyReviewed in the United States on December 20, 2019
2.0 out of 5 stars
Seagal Meets Christmas Story!
Verified purchase
With Seagal's very minor role largely confined to sitting at a laptop, smoking an obscenely huge cigar, and mumbling in a dialect heretofore unknown to the English language, we are left with a puzzling mess of a promising action film. Forget the usual Seagal martial arts displays that one would expect. He moves less in this disappointing effort than the stagnant toupee guarding his forehead. In fact, one might surmise that Seagal's total time on the set was less than a day, sans trips to the catering line. However, the project is redeemed somewhat by the appearance of capable actor Zack Ward, who is forever haunted by his role as Scott Farkus, the evil neighborhood kid in the classic "Christmas Story." Like Farkus, Ward preys on the innocent in a role that might inspire the viewer to envision an older Scott Farkus as a misguided adult, emotionally crippled by his ambition to rise to the top of his own criminal universe. If one can forget Seagal's limited presence (and his bewildering "top" billing on the credits) and simply enjoy a senior citizen's version of "The Punisher, then all is not lost--until a disjointed and confusing conclusion where no one is a winner, including the viewer...
25 people found this helpful
M. E. AmaralReviewed in the United States on August 10, 2020
3.0 out of 5 stars
This is not a sequel *****SPOILERS*****
Verified purchase
Honestly, I've not seen the last three or four of Seagal's films. I *OWN* them, but I have fallen behind in my viewing.
I have 99% of his 40+ film collection and I want to be clear that I don't just collect his videos; I watch and generally enjoy them.
This movie, "Beyond the Law," is the latest of his releases that I've seen, and I enjoyed it.
It is, by far, not one of his typical plots, nor his typical role.
He plays the father of the primary antagonist, but it neither the "bad guy," or the protagonist. This is one of his most "passive" characters that I can recall (at the moment... his career spans DECADES).
The story is one of the more interesting and inspired.
IT IS BY NO WAY A SEQUEL TO HIS HIT DEBUT FILM, "ABOVE THE LAW."
However, like his former hit, this one plays with the title in both literal and symbolic form.
((I hate to sound all "hoity-toity film-school-studenty"... mainly because I am not... but I am an English teacher, so I apologize for some of the terminology I use.))
"Above the Law" was about people/organizations who believed they were literally above the law, and carried out their greedy, immoral, amoral plots with impunity until Seagal's character stops and exposes them.
"Beyond the Law" is a bit more inventive. I honestly had no idea where this was going until the final moments before the credits rolled. Once again, the writer(s) took the title literally and the protagonist does lots of anti-hero things to achieve his justice, then dies... and in death, he is truly BEYOND the law. That clever "twist" bumped this Seagal title into the "watch again" and "share with others" category. (I don't know if I can call it a twist because they TOLD US in the title where the plot would go.)

The setting (locations, time period, atmosphere) was good and fit the plot.
The characters were defined enough to move the plot along. They were interesting and varied enough to tell each apart and held my interest when they were on screen.

>Bill Cobb (Swilley) was criminally under used. His character mainly delivered much of the exposition. I would have listened and watched him for the whole film expounding the exploits of his friend. (So sorry for the alliteration.)

>Zack Ward (Desmond Packard) and DMX (Detective Munce) were great and carried their roles better than most.

>The absolutely delicious Saxon Sharbino (Charlotte) played the same role she always plays. She's good at it, and she was well cast here.

>The antagonist's posse was actually written with some good character and in a longer film they would have been interesting to get to know (even though they were essentially "cannon fodder," I'm glad a couple lived beyond the stupidity of the antagonist).

>Sadly, Chester Rushing's character (Chance) was forgettable, no matter how much the script fought against that. For the first half of the film, every time he was mentioned and even when he was on screen, my mind needed to reference my memory of the characters the audience was supposed to care about and often drew a blank.

>Johnny Messner (Frank Wilson) needed more development on screen about his past and what led him to where he is when we find him. Were there a couple of scenes of him and Swilley kicking it wherever that was? Maybe a couple of flash-backs to his time on the force? Maybe Swilley could remember how it was that Frank came to be there; Munce could hear more rumors from other detectives or informants; Desmond could have been warned off by the older people who were part of Adair's "kingdom" (like the remarkably performed doorman, whose name escapes me... I loved his physical reactions to Frank's arrival). Frank was a great character anyway and I was continually intrigued and surprised to see what he would do next. The failed father part needed to either be cut or expanded because I felt that it just interrupted the momentum of Frank's mission.

>There is much to say about Steven Seagal's "Augustino 'Finn' Adair." Too much. Seagal's presence in the film seemed almost forced. Honestly, aside from a few scenes, I felt that Seagal floated above the rest of the characters, setting, and plot-- he could have filmed his parts at a completely different time and location, where the cast would be transported to him on cue. I think there was some brief and forgettable exposition near the beginning of the film (could have been thrown onto the screen with a Star Wars opening scroll.) Unfortunately, I was absorbing the setting (when is this taking place? where is this happening?), processing the inciting incident (which was confusing as hell), and trying to follow and identify the characters. -- So, yeah, he pops in a few times, presses the plot forward or imparts choice bits of exposition, and generally comes off as the benevolent overlord of a realm that, frankly, I have no idea of what he is the kingpin. Still... it's Seagal, and when he appears, all is good (except, maybe, the end).

Frank has a lawyer friend who appears without much ado in the last act, to give advice to Frank and together they work out a plan that assures us that justice is served. The lawyer friend should have been there from the beginning.

There were a few scenes where the director must have stepped out and the actors read their lines from cue cards. A couple of those were pretty important moments that I probably missed because the flat performances were so distracting.

Still, I was more than satisfied by the end of this film.

There are absolutely no special features. None. That is disappointing. Given the course of the plot, the twists and sudden turns, I would have listened to the writer or director speaking on how they handled these elements and where they may have added or done things differently.

This one is well worth a viewing. I collect Seagal, so I bought the disc-- if you simply need a good, down and dirty revenge story with THE Steven, then this is the one to watch.
8 people found this helpful
Ben SmithReviewed in the United States on November 16, 2021
5.0 out of 5 stars
Advanced movie
Verified purchase
This movie requires a more advanced knowledge of the crime/mafia world. If you know, then you realize it's a masterpiece.
The plot is fairly simple, but that means NO PLOT HOLES. which is great. Everyone played their part amazingly. No character was a hero.
Segal's role, was brilliant. He only spoke, allowed others to do his dirty work until the very end, then he showed why he's the boss.
Segal's son played a great role of an emerging wannabe crime boss who's really just a killing psychopath.
The anti-hero of the movie was just that, a perfect anti-hero, but also not invincible at all.
And, DMX played a dirty cop perfectly.

I was beyond blown away how good this movie was, and how it still holds up 20+ years later.

The only thing I would say negative is some of the characters that had nothing to do with the movie were given unneeded dialogue. And whoever played the "product connection", she was terrible. It's like they pulled a model out of a catalog and told her "here, say this", luckily, her screen time was only about 2 minutes.
errin spellingReviewed in the United States on November 8, 2020
3.0 out of 5 stars
he isn't a n fbi agent or a cop or in any type of law enforcement
Verified purchase
shocking, when you realize seagal is playing a bad guy. he keeps asking his son to be good, but his son is a psychopath. there is no form of transition at all , in this movie. you see someone behind a bar working and a minute later they are at a nightclub abusing women , at a mafia round table. not one of the greatest movies , he has made.leave ossie davis alone, you psychopath and why didn't he have a gun, when he knew seagal's son was coming. someone did not give very much thought to, this movie, when they made it.
5 people found this helpful
BELinMAReviewed in the United States on November 14, 2021
1.0 out of 5 stars
Absolutely awful
Verified purchase
I never have high expectations for a Seagal movie. Entertainment is all that is required and I've enjoyed many of his earlier films. This one, though, fails to clear a very low bar. I don't mind suspending belief, but eradicating any semblance of a plot or logic makes this unwatchable for me. As trite as his vampire movies set in eastern Europe are, they're much better than whatever this was supposed to be.
4 people found this helpful
B. MommaertsReviewed in the United States on February 28, 2021
1.0 out of 5 stars
Another lousy segal movie
Verified purchase
Poor dialogue, lousy editing, large gaps in story line and poor sound. Seagal is getting lazy and fat. Poor plot. If the ratings allowed minus 5 (-5) I would give that rating. Waste of time. Done with his movies.
5 people found this helpful
HappyLifeReviewed in the United States on July 19, 2020
3.0 out of 5 stars
Seagal just a few minutes
Verified purchase
Another average revenge action movie.
Don't get me wrong I don't regret it and good one time rental that was free on a prime subscription channel.
Story is simple but good and aome acting was good. Not much of Seagal just a few minutes.
6 people found this helpful
Joe FlipReviewed in the United States on June 3, 2020
1.0 out of 5 stars
Waste of time
Verified purchase
What a terrible movie, Thank God I paid 99 cents for it, Steven Seagel used to be the Man but not in this picture, his acting was like a plastic man and the rest of the cast forget it. I rather watch one of his older movies. Pleas don"twaste your time.
5 people found this helpful
See all reviews