Other Sellers on Amazon
How the Mind Works Paperback – Illustrated, June 22, 2009
|New from||Used from|
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Frequently bought together
Explore similar books
"Big, brash, and a lot of fun."
"Hugely entertaining…always sparkling and provoking."
― Wall Street Journal
"Witty popular science that you enjoy reading for the writing as well as for the science. No other science writer makes me laugh so much."
― Mark Ridley, New York Times Book Review
"Alters completely the way one thinks about thinking…its unforeseen consequences probably can't be contained by a book."
― Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, New York Times
"Pinker has a knack for making the profound seem obvious....A fascinating bag of evolutionary insights."
― The Economist
About the Author
- ASIN : 0393334775
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; Illustrated edition (June 22, 2009)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 672 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780393334777
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393334777
- Item Weight : 1.9 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.1 x 1.2 x 9.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #124,596 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Reviews with images
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Every good teacher learns from experience when introducing someone to a subject to do so with the least amount of information; just so the learner can build a structural skeleton of knowledge. Knowing that with intellectual curiosity knowledge gaps will gaps can be filled later. Good teachers lean it is essential to build the structure first.
Steven Pinker sounds like someone who is high on a joint before he wrote; and the words and ideas overflowed into a rambling mass of ideas that connects loosely to the theme.
Some of the same subject matter in this book is treated masterfully in the books "Evolution for Everyone" by David Sloan Wilson. "The Self Illusion" by Bruce Hood. "Bootstrapping Complexity" by Kevin Kelly. I enjoyed reading and learning from these books.
I purchased several of his books based on reading write-ups; I'm sorry that I did.
Top reviews from other countries
Steven Pinker's view is that much of what we perceive as intelligence, personality and thought is inherited; in other words is a product of evolution.
Many supporters of artificial intelligence cling to a hope that the brain is made of general purpose grey matter, and that intelligence will spontaneously spring into existence if you can create the right sort of 'connectoplasm'. Professor Pinker demolishes that hope: our brains are made up of specialised modules, the product of millions of years of evolution
Post-modern social scientists, not to mention teachers, parents and religious leaders, cling to a hope that mind and personality are social constructs, that it is not 'all in the genes'. Professor Pinker quotes statistics that show that they are largely wrong, that genes play the key role in our character.
Richard Dawkins introduced the idea of 'memes' and Daniel Dennett extended the idea of evolution to include non-genetic selection. Professor Pinker thinks they went too far. For Pinker, the overriding force in what it is to be human is genetic -- good old Darwinian evolution.
However, the book is not all negative. Chapter by chapter, Pinker picks an aspect of human behaviour, character or thought, and shows how it is the result of Darwinian selection and the 'selfish gene'. His insights are far more cogent and persuasive than previous writers such as Freud or Jung, because of this scientific basis in evolution. Pinker really has found a key to unlock at least some of what it is to be human, and it makes his book essential reading for students of human character.
To me, there are two weakness to the book, and I think they are related.
Pinker addresses the idea of Consciousness, meaning his sense of there being an 'I', the subject of his experiences. The colour red is a range of wavelengths of light; it causes excitations in particular nerve cells; the verbal centres of the brain respond and cause his mouth to say 'red'. But nowhere in that description is the obvious truth that Steven Pinker experienced red colour. Daniel Dennett in his excellent, if ambitiously named, book 'Consciousness Explained' claims that there is no such thing as the experience of red, other than that physical explanation of the wavelengths and nerve excitations. Pinker disagrees. He thinks that consciousness cannot be explained away (I think he is right). However, he asserts that it is not something that can be explained, because humans are simply not clever enough. A hyperintelligent alien might be able to explain exactly what consciousness is in humans and how it relates to the brain and the mind, but a human would not have the mental capability to understand the explanation.
To me, this is a cop out. By evading the question of consciousness, Pinker leaves the door open to some pretty weird ideas (you know what I mean, you've probably read the books too).
My related complaint is that Pinker takes his own introspective intuitions about what is happening inside his head too literally. His introspection tells him that he sees a picture of the world: so he assumes that inside his brain there is a two-and-a-bit-dimensional picture of the world mapped out in neurons, for some other piece of brain to look at. His introspection tells him that he thinks in words, though he knows it cannot be English: so he assumes that his internal thoughts are in 'mentalese'.
These intuitions are what Daniel Dennett calls the 'Cartesian Theatre', and for him they pave a road leading to infinite regress and incoherent ideas about consciousness.
I'd love to see a book co-authored by Dennett and Pinker. They both write superbly well, and in a way that is accessible to all readers. They both start from the same scientific premises. Yet they have very different answers to some key questions. Until they write such a book together, you must read them separately. But please do -- they are not right about everything, but they will lead you to a better understanding of Mind than any other writer living.
Well worth persevering with the book.
(Computational theory of mind) + (evolutionary reverse engineering) = (How the mind works)
Well hypothesised, well written, and well defended. This is more of an outcome of intense research work than a mere psychology nonfiction. This book is a work of a pioneer of the highly developing field called Evolutionary Psychology. For lack of a more precise analogy, Steven Pinker is Steven Hawking of Psychology.