- File Size: 68639 KB
- Print Length: 97 pages
- Publisher: Simon & Schuster/ TED (July 7, 2015)
- Publication Date: July 7, 2015
- Sold by: Simon and Schuster Digital Sales Inc
- Language: English
- ASIN: B00JSRQUUA
- Text-to-Speech: Enabled
- Word Wise: Enabled
- Lending: Not Enabled
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #93,643 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
How We'll Live on Mars (TED Books) Kindle Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
- Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
- In this edition, page numbers are just like the physical edition
- Create digital flashcards instantly
|New from||Used from|
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Customers who bought this item also bought
About the Author
Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book is designed to be read in a single sitting. As a result, it often does not plumb the depths of some topics. Quite a bit of the book details the history of the ideas of travelling to Mars, beginning with Wermer von Braun (pronounced: Verner fawn Brown).
Petranek covers the psychological, economic, and physical issues involved in getting to and living on Mars rather completely. He spends some time on Mars One and Elon Musk, suggesting that the former is a very long shot due to funding issues (I agree) and that the latter is almost guaranteed to succeed for a variety of reasons (I agree again). He spends a bit too much space on slamming NASA, albeit with some good reasons. He even indicts Richard Nixon as the primary person responsible for us not reaching Mars already.
As to the errors, they are relatively minor compared to the scope and thrust of the book. For example, the author writes, "When you run out of oxygen in a space suit, you can only breathe the carbon dioxide that you exhale for so long before you lose consciousness." In fact, you will die of carbon dioxide "poisoning" long before you use up the oxygen. Assuming that you are breathing regular air, oxygen is 20% of the content, and carbon dioxide is much less than 1%. By the time CO2 reaches 5%, O2 has dropped to just 15% because one CO2 molecule is produced for each O2 used. You have used up just 1/4 of the O2 available and are dead.
Petranek is very correct about no animals on Mars. They are much too inefficient as a source of food. He remarks that early Martian settlers will be vegetrarians. They'll actually be vegans, meaning that special attention must be paid to vitamins D and B12. These are available from sources such as yeast, lichen, and mushrooms. He also says that settlers are unlikely to produce more than ten percent of their own food. This pessimistic view contrasts strongly with some of his other optimism. Advances in genetic engineering, aeroponics, and fast hybridization should alter this forecast considerably. Self-suffciency is not just nice, it's a necessity.
The remarks on radiation are fairly accurate. Everyone should understand that radiation in space is about twice as harmful as that on Mars because cosmic rays come from all directions and are shielded from half of the cosmic sphere by Mars itself. Solar radiation also is shield half of the time, nighttime, by the planet as well.
Another pervasive issue is oxygen and atmospheric pressures. We have to have an oxygen partial pressure of around 150 millibars or so to survive. This is the pressure at the highest cities on Earth and is less than 1/6 of the pressure of the Earth's atmosphere at sea level. Even if the entire atmospheric pressure were this low, your blood would not boil. Other physiological processes may not be so amenable to low pressures. However, we should find out how low the pressure can go if we keep the partial pressure of oxygen constant at 160 millibars. Lower pressures mean lower construction costs and also have strong implications for terraforming Mars. In my book, Mars Rhapsody, I took the most optimistic view that you could live at 160 millibars of total pressure with all of it coming from oxygen.
The suggestion that plants can convert the CO2 into O2 in adequate amounts is way off. Mars has maybe 8-10 millibars of CO2. Converting it all to O2 would produce only that amount of oxygen, which is 20 or so times to low. Bacteria, lichen, and plants cannot "fix" Mars alone. We must have a much greater souce of O2. However, genetic engineering humans may be possible to make tolerating high CO2 levels and surviving with low O2 levels possible, but not without lots more O2 than you can get from plants.
The potential for genetic engineering humans to make them more radiation resistant, able to eat and metabolize plants that grow on Mars, making them able, perhaps by making them smaller, able to subsist on a limited diet, and allowing them to breathe much thinner air is explored in the book. The question not addressed is when these altered humans become a different species. What if we populate Mars to save our species but do so in such a way as to create an entirely different species? Earth humans, as we know them, may not be able to emigrate to Mars after all.
More discussion would be nit-picking. There's plenty in this book to recommend it. No one, even me, gets this entirely right, and no one knows all of the answers or even all of the problems. For a quick overview of how we'll get to Mars and how we'll live there, this is a very decent essay.
A much more reasoned, balanced and comprehensive narrative is available in the more recent book, “Mars: Our Future on the Red Planet,” which was commissioned by National Geographic to accompany their TV series on MARS. As expected, the large format artwork and photographs of Mars are spectacular.
But in his book, Petranek claims right away in his intro “the settlement of Mars is about to happen far sooner than most people realize.” Wrong, I’m afraid. The question, rather, is will some of still be alive by the time NASA and the world actually pony up to sending just a very modest crew of marsonauts to the surface of the red planet.
The author takes his optimistic viewpoints from interviews with only those self-proclaimed visionaries who have never participated in any actual missions to Mars and tend to be naïve about the challenges. In the book, many issues are misrepresented. As if it isn’t enough for Elon Musk’s fanciful claims he will build a rocket that will loft one hundred people all the way to Mars (the Saturn V could only send 3 ‘nauts to the moon, with only a couple week’s worth of food, water, TP, etc.), Petranek claims he was told by Musk that he will send 80,000 settlers in a single trip (p. 33).
Similarly, the author swallows the Zubrin claim that terraforming is a sure bet, and simple to accomplish. Something far less challenging would be ex post facto “fixing” global warming on Earth. Petranek seems uninformed that space-borne mirrors cannot simply remain stationary over a pole of Mars --- that works only at the equator. And, if it were feasible at Mars, wouldn’t entrepreneurs on Earth have conspired to convert Siberian permafrost into tropical farmland long ago?
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see that many of these visionary proposals are far into the future, if feasible at all. The author is neither a scientist nor a rocket expert, but doesn’t mind opining, incorrectly, that there have been no advances in rocketry since the Saturn.
The author seems to have researched only recent Mars exploration, attributing many of the discoveries originally made at Mars by the 1976 Viking missions instead to the rovers exploring the landscape decades later. Several statements are blatantly ignorant of fundamental scientific facts, such as the claim that hydration of nitrates releases nitrogen, when it is the nitrate that is the fertilizer for plants and the nitrogen in the atmosphere is useless except in special cases involving bacteria. Or, that the problem with Mars is distance, when it actually is time (once we blast off a rocket from Earth to go to Mars, it is coasting virtually the entire distance, but you cannot speed up the transfer without sacrificing the amount of mass that you can transfer).
There are better books available to get a glimpse of what Mars could provide in our future. If this is the only one you read, and believe, you will be regrettably misinformed.
Top international reviews
I’m very glad I did. The text is well written, thoughtful and quite comprehensive and has given me reasons to modify that original story, fortunately before I began the editing process!
Petranek has clearly researched his subject well and consulted many different sources to arrive at his conclusions. His vision of the future for flights to Mars and the possibility of humans colonising the planet is well-considered and based on information and news relating to the space agencies and to those commercial companies that have been set up to explore the red planet.
He looks at all aspects of exploration and occupation of the most well-known of our neighbouring planets. His understanding of the science in all the fields he covers is extensive and he points out the realities of each challenge as well as the potential solutions to the problems. His tone is optimistic but realistic and he produces enough information for the reader to make up his/her own mind about the possibilities of each proposition. That the colonisation of Mars will proceed, there appears to be no doubt. There are, however, doubts about the timescale and the probable initiators of the human exploration of the planet. Will it be a state run space agency like NASA, ISRO, or ROSCOSMOS, or will it be one of the commercial concerns like SPACEX or MARS ONE? Petranek seems to favour SPACEX as the front- runner.
As a source for the science fiction writer setting a story on Mars, this is an excellent resource and it’s certainly given me plenty of food for thought. Food, of course, is a major concern for colonisation and the author tackles the subject with his usual thoroughness. He looks at atmosphere, water, power, transport, human health, terraforming and lots more in this volume.
I found the book both entertaining and highly informative. There’s a good deal of common and uncommon sense on these pages and he makes it clear where speculation lies and where there is good evidential reason to believe in a specific outcome. A very good read.
Some slight syntax and grammatical errors here and there, but certainly nothing that disrupts the flow of the content.
4/5 as I would have personally liked a little more specifics (chemical formulae, etc), but it's not really needed in this book.
Es ist sehr informativ und unterhaltsam geschrieben, so dass man es innerhalb kürzester Zeit verschlungen hat. Der geringe Umfang und Unterhaltungswert machen es zusätzlich zum perfekten Begleiter für U-Bahn-Pendler.
Die Kritik, dass das Buch lückenhafte Informationen bietet kann ich nicht nachvollziehen: Letztendlich ist es eine Theorie, die dem Leser "mundgerecht" und entertaining aufbereitet wurde und sehr wohl einen guten Überblick der Thematik gibt - empfehlenswert!