The rating led me to believe this was a PG-13 movie, but the violence and constant prolonged breast shots were unnecessary. There were 2 women whose breasts were exposed, a wet t-shirt contest, and a fairly long sex scene. I'm not sure how graphic the wet t-shirt contest or sex scene were, because I simply fast forwarded.
I'm not sure why I kept watching this movie. It was terrible and not just for the excessive nudity. Even if you are a more liberal person, the way that women were portrayed (jealous, conniving, man-stealers) was low. Oh, and one of the main guy characters seemed like a cheater, too. Just terrible relationships.
There was a certain drama in wanting to know what would happen to this couple who unknowingly were helping some underhanded crime types, but if this is the future of entertainment then I think I will stick to reading books.

this makes two-in-a-row that were 16:9 / 5.1. I like that very much. I like the action and violence. I like the shooting. I like the punching and kicking. Being on a boat gives other ways to inflict death. This was first on the recommendations that Prime thinks I would like.

This movie was a waste of 91 minutes of my life — scratch that, make it just 45 minutes...

P.S.: On reflection, the plot was actually pretty good, but the volley ball scene and nightclub scene were chaos and the movie would have been helped if they were left out or at least cut down to a few seconds.

Felt like watching a cheap soap opera. Wasn't a terrible movie, but it's not something you would ever want to recommend to a friend, unless it was a prank.

The story is about two divers played by Chris Carmack and Laura Vandervoort who love to explore hidden treasures at a bottom of a local reef. One day after a day of exploring they are approached by a couple played by David Anders and Marsha Thomason. They tell the young divers that they want to hire them to explore the reef and find a rare artifact about Columbus' hidden treasure that is reported at the bottom of the reef.

Next day the four dive to the bottom of the reef and of coarse after a whole day of diving they find nothing. A few more days past and the two hired divers found out that they a part of a major deadly plot in which they can't escape otherwise they will be killed. They were hired to find two big containers. One contains a nuclear reactor and the other contains a core.

The movie also has a back story about another person (brother of the lead character) trying to patch things up with his girlfriend, I reckon this part of the story was a waste of time, this also includes a very steamy sex scene between the couple which to me is a complete waste and wasn't needed to be shown.

However apart from that, this movie does have some good underwater photography and the colors blend in well which is why it receives 4 stars. Into The Blue 2 is a sequel only by name. None of the original actors or characters return

they shouldn't have done the second one, the story line is pretty lame. the first ones story line and acting was much better.

I didn't think it was low budget. It dragged on a little in certain places, but overall good acting, young people, perfect bodies, and the ocean. what could be better? Oh yes, a happy ending too.

did anyone hold their breath while they were under water, sure you did...