John Adams under Fire: The Founding Father's Fight for Justice in the Boston Massacre Murder Trial Audio CD – Unabridged, March 3, 2020
|New from||Used from|
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Frequently bought together
"Abrams and Fisher do a superb job of clearly presenting the issues in this remarkable and intensely dramatic trial."-- "Scott Turow on Theodore Roosevelt for the Defense"
"Dan Abrams and David Fisher present a fascinating window into the former President Roosevelt that is fresh and often surprising. This trial and Roosevelt's defense of his reputation on the stand, often under fierce questioning, is truly mesmerizing."-- "Brian Kilmeade on Theodore Roosevelt for the Defense"
"Dan Abrams and David Fisher write the heart-pounding pulse of history...This book not only brings a rare transcript to life, it makes you feel as if you are watching a live camera riveted on a courtroom more than 150 years ago."-- "Diane Sawyer on Lincoln's Last Trial"
"The story is both compelling on its own terms and a lesson about some eternal truths about criminal justice."-- "Jeffrey Toobin on Lincoln's Last Trial"
About the Author
Dan Abrams is the CEO and founder of Abrams Media and chief legal affairs anchor for ABC News. He is also the host of both 60 Days In and Live PD on A&E. A graduate of Columbia University Law School, he is the author of the Washington Post bestseller Man Down and has written for the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, and the Yale Law and Policy Review, among many others. He lives in New York.
David Fisher is the author of more than twenty New York Times bestsellers. His work has also appeared in most major magazines and many newspapers. He lives in New York with his wife and two sons.
- Publisher : Harlequin Audio and Blackstone Publishing; Unabridged edition (March 3, 2020)
- Language : English
- Audio CD : 1 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1094098248
- ISBN-13 : 978-1094098241
- Item Weight : 2.85 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.25 x 0.75 x 6.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,832,296 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Adams was a thirty-four-year-old Boston attorney when he agreed to defend the British soldiers who either committed an unprovoked massacre of peaceful Boston citizens, or were defending themselves from a mob. The officer in charge was tried separately from the rest of the soldiers. By sheer good fortune a transcript still exists from the second trial.
Dan Abrams, the author of this book, also wrote a fabulous book to which I gave a glowing review, called “Lincoln’s Last Trial.” It was a trial in which Abraham Lincoln was the defense attorney, and a transcript in shorthand still existed from it. How Abrams finds these marvelous documents is beyond me, but I am super-grateful that he does because the books he writes are fascinating.
I enjoyed this book very much. Some people apparently thought that the details of the trials were tedious; I must be a legal nerd, I thought they were interesting. I was interested in the effects of the trials on the local citizenry, as well as on American jurisprudence. I admit, my husband and son-in-law are lawyers, so I may be inured to legal talk!
I can happily recommend this book to anyone interested in American history (or British history, come to that), or American jurisprudence, or anyone interested in reading a true account of a well-known but little understood pivotal moment in the run-up to the American War for Independence. I hope that the author has another historical work in mind.
Thanks to the publisher and NetGalley for the ARC. The opinions are my own.
The book proceeds chronologically. First there is an introductory discussion of the Boston colony and the massacre. Why were 2,000 British troops there in the first place? Then a couple of chapters are devoted to Adams, his practice and writings, and his involvement in opposing British rule. Nonetheless, the authors probe why he took on the defense of Captain Preston and his seven soldiers in two separate trials even though this might severely damage his practice. Since revenge rather than justice was what Boston seemed to be demanding.
The authors first discuss the trial of Captain Preston. There was no official transcript kept of this trial (or many other trials), so the description is less detailed than the second trial account. One of the interesting things to me was how the lawyers tried to educate the jurors as to legal concepts. Writers on English law such as Blackstone, were relied upon. Having a defense lawyer conducting a trial was a rare event at this time. In fact the Adams defensive team was comprised of three lawyers; in addition there we four judges presiding. What was to come in the second trial was strongly suggested here: much testimony with a lot of conflicts. Adams was able to convince the jury that the prosecution never proved that Preston gave the order for his troops to "fire." He was acquitted.
The second trial is the core of the book. The authors are fortunate because someone had paid a private wordsmith to create some manner of transcript for this trial. This book is somewhat unique in that the author's discuss the testimony given by a very large number of witnesses--not just a summary. There was little physical evidence, so the testimony was the key thing. This can get a bit numbing for the reader since there are many discrepancies in the testimony which the authors identify. Key issues come up again and again: who shot whom, when, did the mob threaten the soldiers sufficiently to justify self defense, did the mob heave a great deal of material at the soldiers before they fired, and was the mob made up of local citizens (a point Adams wisely stayed away from) or was it composed of "rabble" and armed sailors looking for trouble Though making one's way through all this testimony can be daunting, it shows you the challenges Adams faced in defending these troops.
I was surprised in the scholarly arguments Adams made. He read frequently out of leading English legal works and threw quite a lot of complex legal issues at the jurors. But going into these issues in depth, and Adams is quoted extensively, gives the reader a much better grasp of the issues. It was also interesting to see the four judges charge the jurors, in the typical English fashion of the day by discussing substantive issues of fact or hinting at what parts of the evidence they found convincing. Only two soldiers were convicted, not of murder but of manslaughter. These two argued for "benefit of clergy" since they could read, and got off with being branded on their thumbs.Adams therefore prevailed, but as the authors explain, so too did the rule of law at this early point in American history. My only criticism of the book is that it lacks any notes, though a solid bibliography is attached.
The trial parts in particular simply overwhelmed me. I could never have sat on either of these juries. This book found me dozing and I finally gave up on it. I did find out that both the British officer in charge and the British soldiers were both found not guilty.
Simply put, this book overwhelmed me. I'm being generous with two stars based solely on my interest level and not due to any lack of scholarship on the author's part.