I don't have any specific complaint against the story itself. The characters are interesting, the plot believable, and the action both intense and well-detailed.
My only complaint comes from the short passages at chapter beginnings of his world's version of R.A.H.'s fictional "History and Moral Philosophy", featured in 'The Lotus Eaters' with a title in Spanish.
I really, really don't understand his insistence on including Ayn Rand in the same 'millennial' category as Karl Marx. His specific complaint is that her solutions to national defense and plague prevention amount to 'wishful thinking'. And my reply to this is "Where the f*^& do you get that from?"
If anything the very Legion el Cid itself is very similar to the kind of solution that she envisioned to the problem of national defense, albeit one voluntarily funded by the population rather than by foreign governments (the latter being a solution that could only exist so long as other governments did not follow her political model, a fatal weakness that would put it on par with Marxism). And since he presents and advances nothing in the novel to compare with Rand's ideas about public health vis-a-vis plague protection, I don't have anything to offer there.
The actual Legion story is very interesting, and some of the other passages in the History and Moral Philosophy excerpts that we get are interesting themselves, although some of Jorge Mendoza's difficulties in writing his thesis become much easier to understand when what are clearly later passages come to the fore. Given their inclusions, we can reasonably expect that Mendoza's ideas reflect author Kratman's, and Kratman's lack of the more technical academic skills becomes clear here, because where he grapples with issues of morality. More specifically: he fails to identify that there ARE, in fact, multiple basic moral theories, and that he has problems with the one that he has formulated rather than with morality in general.
Claiming as he does that there may not be a permanent solution to man's moral problems is not very convincing when you have quite clearly never stopped to re-examine the moral theory you are working with for contradictions and flaws, or even to identify that you are using a particular moral theory rather than another one. The moral theory described clearly has both elements of utilitarianism and altruism, along with some others.
Perhaps it simply never occurs to Kratman that the problem may be in his theory? It's often said, after all, that what works in theory may not work in reality. This is said by fools. The more accurate version is "If it doesn't work in practice, the theory is bad". Kratman fails to divine a solution (admittedly through what appears to be honest effort), but condemns the materials (men) and the workers (politicians) instead of the blueprints (theory) when his building (political/social system) doesn't stand.
Heinlein understood this issue a little better, and this is reflected in many of the passages in the actual History and Moral Philosophy classroom lectures we get from "Starship Troopers". Neither author was sufficiently technically skilled to identify the flaws in their approach to moral study (a fault that Ayn Rand did not share, hence the more cohesive and complete moral theory presented in Atlas Shrugged), although certainly both men gave significant honest effort to the problem (for which I cannot fault them).
Aside from all that, the various swipes that Kratman takes at the Kosmos (the international leftist media), the Tauran Union (clearly the EU), and the Progs in the FSC are quite satisfying. I became aware of journalists with the AP manufacturing "military kills unarmed people" photos with regards to the Israel/Lebanon conflict of a few years ago, where one critic noted that a wounded man in one photo was clearly a medic in another photo, and the same man appearing as an insurgent in a third, along with numerous other photos that while emotionally poignant were clearly staged. Reading about the Legion standing these reporters against a wall and executing them was very satisfying. Reading further about the forced sex-change surgery inflicted on the jihadists was also viscerally satisfying.
So, a good story, and a good series. I can't leave off a star from this rating, although I want to, because I see what Ayn Rand described as the honest resignation of a man who has given his best effort and failed.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Mass Market Paperback
"Please retry" | — | $2.59 |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $9.99 | $8.41 | — |
- Read with Our Free App
-
Audiobook
$0.00 - 23 Used from $2.29 10 New from $14.83 2 Collectible from $10.95
- 26 Used from $2.59
- 7 New from $8.41
From USA Today bestselling author L.J. Shen comes a passion- and angst-charged story about a woman caught between a secure relationship and a once-in-a-lifetime spark with her muse. | Learn more
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
