In the hopes that I can avoid showing all the spoilers until anyone who wants to scroll past has the chance to, I'll start off by saying that I love horror movies. I read horror books. I write horror stories myself. I'm not turned off by gore or a good old fashioned scary asylum movie.
Now that I've gotten all of that out of the way, I'll explain what I liked about the film first:
1. There was some truly disturbing scenes of body horror and gore in the film that made me flinch. That doesn't happen all that often since I've seen a lot of horror movies over the years.
2. The musical score was good in quite a few places actually.
3. The actor who played Lucas did a fairly good job of acting (considering how bad the film was.)
Now, onto the spoilers:
The plot: Lucas and his ex-girlfriend, Chloe, are gamers who enjoy puzzles. When Chloe finds out about a game, called Paranoia, she teams up with Lucas to try to win a million Euro prize for solving all the puzzles first.
The couple obviously have some dysfunctionality in their relationship. That's clear from the start, but they work together anyway to figure out how to get to the site where the final part of the Paranoia game will be played. Once they get there (an abandoned mental health hospital), they see there's already several other players waiting on them for the game to begin. Maxine, Jablowski, Ray, and Naomi. Naomi apparently knows Lucas, but it's not clear how.
Once the game begins, they are teamed up with one other person to figure out the puzzles. Once in a room, if they figure out the puzzle, they will not only be allowed out of the locked room, but they will receive a clue and a puzzle piece.
It doesn't take long before the players start being murdered in horrible ways. In order not to ruin the few interesting parts of this film, I won't explain how they die.
In the end of the movie, Lucas is the only one who is still alive. We see a set of flashbacks that indicate Lucas isn't who we thought he was. We see his past and the tragedy that was his childhood with a horrible mother. And we realize that Lucas is a severely disturbed individual.
Now, to the things I hated about this film:
1. It was predictable. Even though there was a lame attempt to blame the murders on Naomi, that wasn't kept up long enough to actually make the viewer believe she was the killer. That left only 2 people who could've been it. Having seen how Lucas talked to Chloe and treated her off and on throughout the film, no one should've been surprised to figure out what was really happening.
2. The puzzles were even more obscure than most escape room puzzles tend to be. A person watching the movie would've probably enjoyed the opportunity to try to figure out some of these alongside the people in the film. However, the puzzles were just dumb, in general, with little to no interesting riddles that made any sense. Of course, given what the plot is, this isn't a huge surprise since the show itself was weak with little to nothing interesting or that made sense. Puzzles in the show should've been interesting. I do understand it's based on a book that I've not read personally. I can't say if the puzzles in the book were as bad as the ones on the screen.
3. There are glaring inconsistencies in the movie that show sloppy film making. In one scene, you can see a "dead" person's hands moving slightly. In another, you will probably wonder how one person got a jacket on when they didn't have one before. It's things like this that stand out. They shouldn't...the movie should be so good that you aren't focused on these types of things.
4. The story is supposed to end in an ambiguous way that makes you question if all of it has really happened, or if it's all in one person's head. This could've worked if we (as viewers) ever saw who the other players supposedly were (in relation to the mentally ill person). We don't. The police show up at the end and if it was all in one person's head (not really occurring), it makes little sense for the police to show up in a situation that hasn't really occurred. Is it an elaborate daydream? Who knows. And furthermore, who really cares? It's not that good of a movie that you feel like you would. The film maker isn't David Lynch. He's not Stanley Kubrick. He isn't capable of pulling off the finesse it takes to make a psychological horror story trippy enough to interest the viewer and make them question.
5. HOW did the person who set all of this up..have the MONEY to do it? This is some elaborate stuff for a person who has no cash (and apparently works at a liquor store). They even have the ability to set up an entire techno rave.
6. Mental health disorders (like the ones shown in the movie) don't happen like that. It shows a lack of insight and research for a writer to put out this type of pedantic garbage that's obviously incorrect. It's possible to write really good psychological horror where the mental health disorders are more believable and (therefore) relatable to the reader/viewer. This was the typical type of thing you've seen before in movies. You won't really be surprised at the "twist" ending.
The best part of this film, though? It was free. Even then, I think I'd like the hour+ of my life back that I wasted watching this.
I don't recommend it. You can find something better to watch.