Amazon.com: Customer reviews: Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model
Skip to main content
.us
Hello Select your address
All
EN
Hello, sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Disability Customer Support Clinic Best Sellers Customer Service Amazon Basics New Releases Prime Music Today's Deals Books Registry Fashion Amazon Home Pharmacy Gift Cards One Medical Toys & Games Sell Coupons Luxury Stores Automotive Find a Gift Beauty & Personal Care Computers Home Improvement Health & Household Products Pet Supplies Video Games Smart Home Audible
Shop Father's Day gifts

  • Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
202 global ratings
5 star
79%
4 star
15%
3 star
3%
2 star
2%
1 star
1%
Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model

Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model

byMatthew D. Schwartz
Write a review
How customer reviews and ratings work

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
A. Lupsasca
5.0 out of 5 starsThe new standard
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on January 25, 2014
Short version: overall, this is the best QFT textbook available right now. It succeeds in covering a lot of ground without sacrificing accessibility. It is up to date and has some great exercises. It is also rare in that many derivations are worked out explicitly. If you are (relatively) new to the subject and want to start learning QFT, this book is probably your best bet.

Longer version:

About the author: Matt Schwartz is a professor at Harvard, where he has taught a very popular introductory QFT course several times over the last few years. The first half of the book (Parts I through III) arose from lecture notes that he prepared for the class, and whose contents have therefore been thoroughly student-tested (full disclosure: I was one of the students who pored over every equation in those notes). The result is the most pedagogical introduction to QFT to date. With the new material in Parts IV and V, it presents all the topics covered in an intensive year-long course.

The exercises at the end of every chapter have also been student-tested and are for the most part very illuminating: you’ll be asked to perform illustrative calculations (the bread and butter of the subject), to explicitly derive relations from the chapter (to test your understanding) or to get some extra practice by expounding on some side topic. Either way, these exercises are a valuable resource and provide additional insight into the material (though beware: in the later chapters, some problems can be fiendishly difficult). Remember: as with any advanced subject, it is crucial that you work through some of the details on your own!

The strength of the presentation lies in the author’s style: Matt Schwartz is not afraid to walk you through derivations step by step and point out common misunderstandings. As a result the book often adopts a chatty style, more akin to a teacher talking to his students than to a dry and terse summary. At 900 pages, it is therefore longer than its competition, but for beginners I see this as a feature rather than a bug!

Some other great features: the book does not assume much in the way of prerequisites (aside from quantum mechanics and special relativity) and even includes a chapter on classical field theory. The explanation of Feynman diagrams is really clear and many examples are provided (the diagrams are numerous and beautifully typeset). The author introduces QED gradually by working his way through scalar QED first, which allows him to focus on some important points without the complications of spinors. Below are some comparisons to similar books out there:

- Peskin & Schroder: the standard QFT textbook (up to now!). The chapters are quite uneven in quality: though some are excellently written (e.g. the discussion on non-abelian gauge theory), others are quite obscure. The going is especially rough in the beginning: for instance, I remember trying to understand the discussion of LSZ in P&S and being completely lost before turning to Matt Schwartz’s much clearer explanation.

Some discussions in P&S have also become somewhat dated, while Schwartz’ book is completely up to date. It even includes a chapter on the spinor helicity formalism, the framework in which the recent work on scattering amplitudes is couched!

- A. Zee's QFT in a Nutshell: this is another favorite of mine, and a great read once you've learned the basics of the subject and are looking for a different viewpoint. It’s also useful for beginners who want to get to know the lay of the land. While this book offers good insights into the subject, it only works through a single computation in detail! A good companion to Schwartz’s book, then, but not a viable alternative.

- Tom Banks’s book: a very concise overview of the subject, but definitely inaccessible to beginners. Banks uses the Schwinger-Dyson equation from the start, but never really explains it. Head over to Chapter 14 of Matt Schwartz’s book to learn about it before even thinking about attacking Banks.

- Mark Srednicki’s book: this book starts at a higher level of abstraction and is great for a second look at QFT. Schwartz’s book is definitely better suited to the novice, however, as it offers a gentler introduction and is more hands on in its approach.

- Weinberg's 3 volumes: notoriously difficult to learn from, but still *the* reference for certain topics. Volume 1, in particular, does the best job of explaining the structure of QFT and why most of it was inevitable. Again, not the place to learn how to compute from, but a pleasure to read after having absorbed Schwartz’s treatment.

In summary, there are now quite a few QFT books available on the market, each with their own niche. Matt Schwartz’ book offers the best compromise in terms of accessibility vs completeness, and should therefore have the widest appeal.
Read more
109 people found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
T. Northover
3.0 out of 5 starsTries to hide too many pitfalls.
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on June 26, 2015
It's OK as a second or third perspective, but on its own this book is very superficial. You expect a certain degree of hand-waving in QFT books, but this one often doesn't even bother with that, just neglecting to mention any issue exists at all.

If you're lucky, it'll be brought up again many chapters later -- "Remember that proof from chapter 6? It was nonsense, here's one that's not quite so bad". Either way, I don't think any trust is built up with the author.

I think the mathematical concepts required are also handled poorly. For example, in two pages it goes from sort-of-defining a Lie group to discussing the classification of their Lie algebras. You could just about see that working in an advanced pure mathematics textbook, where every sentence starts "as you will recall", but this seems to be genuinely expecting you might not know what a Lie group is at the start, in which case you'd have no hope of understanding anything meaningful about the representations based on this.

It does have good points though. Calculations are performed in roughly the right places, and at about the right level of detail to be followed without getting bogged down. It also often gives multiple different viewpoints on the same topic (e.g. deriving the Feynman rules), which is welcome.

In the end, I don't regret buying it, but I'm very glad I've got other books I can trust to compare its breezy exposition against. Folland is a particular favourite.
Read more
22 people found this helpful

Sign in to filter reviews
Filtered by
CriticalClear filter
17 total ratings, 11 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Translate all reviews to English

From the United States

T. Northover
3.0 out of 5 stars Tries to hide too many pitfalls.
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on June 26, 2015
Verified Purchase
It's OK as a second or third perspective, but on its own this book is very superficial. You expect a certain degree of hand-waving in QFT books, but this one often doesn't even bother with that, just neglecting to mention any issue exists at all.

If you're lucky, it'll be brought up again many chapters later -- "Remember that proof from chapter 6? It was nonsense, here's one that's not quite so bad". Either way, I don't think any trust is built up with the author.

I think the mathematical concepts required are also handled poorly. For example, in two pages it goes from sort-of-defining a Lie group to discussing the classification of their Lie algebras. You could just about see that working in an advanced pure mathematics textbook, where every sentence starts "as you will recall", but this seems to be genuinely expecting you might not know what a Lie group is at the start, in which case you'd have no hope of understanding anything meaningful about the representations based on this.

It does have good points though. Calculations are performed in roughly the right places, and at about the right level of detail to be followed without getting bogged down. It also often gives multiple different viewpoints on the same topic (e.g. deriving the Feynman rules), which is welcome.

In the end, I don't regret buying it, but I'm very glad I've got other books I can trust to compare its breezy exposition against. Folland is a particular favourite.
22 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


superR
3.0 out of 5 stars Good book but have too many typos
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on December 2, 2015
Verified Purchase
I think it is a good book overall, no doubt. I bought the 1st printing version. But man, too many typos(see Schwartz's homepage for this book). Even the 2nd and 3rd printing still have lots of typos. Perhaps people should wait until after 5th printings in order to get an almost typo-free textbook.
6 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Marcus Quinn Rodriguez Tenes
1.0 out of 5 stars I would like to see this one burn
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on October 3, 2017
This book has a sexy title, and looks very sexy on a library shelf. However a systematic derivation of the subject, forget it! This book reads like you already understand a **** load about the subject, mathematically and physically. Now there is a lot contained in this book. Maybe it is of use after you have essentially mastered the basics of Field Theory, Group Representations, especially Lorentz and Poincare, but don't think this is a straight staircase from graduate QM and EM to QFT unless you want a lot of holes in your logic. Is this how they are teaching physics at Harvard? Reminds me of Sydney Coleman, but worse, times 10. So much genius talk, trying to talk to you as if you are already so advanced in physics. Yet tell me, how many good books are there written on the necessary preparation in Group Theory and Lorentz Representations written by physicists? Hardly any, most are by mathematicians. Usually when this theory is covered in a QFT or particle physics book by physicists for physicists, it gets a few pages here and there to cover an entire theory developed over decades! Just look at Zee or his competitors. This book is no exception. I would only recommend this book if you already understand QFT at the level of Itzykson. Forget it if you are a beginner. Maybe you will think you are a genius after having got through it, but I can tell you Group Representations is at the heart of QFT and it does a piss poor job of illuminating that. Maybe Physics from Symmetry does better, but that book also suffers from a lack of mathematical detail. Another book that has failed to communicate the prerequisites to this subject, and in a very ugly way. The writing is terrible, equations are just thrown out to you like meat and you're supposed to eat them like a dog. Sorry, I'm a gentleman. Where are my definitions and axioms? No wonder there hasn't been a widely accepted axiomatic formulation of QFT. Because almost all physicists are in the habit of writing tomes like this with no structure.
12 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


V. Isoz
1.0 out of 5 stars Very poor quality book
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on July 17, 2017
Very poor quality book. The developments are never detailed. Perhaps a good book for engineers but not for the people that care about understanding all the steps that lead to a given result. Perhaps a good toilet book for physicists or a good gift to make people to turn them to the Holy Bible or to the Quran...
6 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Vernice Fresca
1.0 out of 5 stars Full of misconceptions. I strongly advise not purchasing it ...
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on June 19, 2015
Full of misconceptions. I strongly advise not purchasing it.
For instance, at the top of p 605, the “Flavor changing neutral current process, such as s —> u e νbar “
is a Charged current, right?
9 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Amazon Customer
2.0 out of 5 stars Unphysical
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on June 13, 2016
This book is unphysical. What do I mean by that? Let me give a few examples:

1) It violates causality.
In most models of the universe, effects cannot precede their causes, and events from the future do not influence events of the past. Not so in this book! Arguments tend to follow highly non-classical trajectories, being spread across many different chapters in a topologically non-trivial manner. Admittedly, in a path integral approach to pedagogy, I'm sure you could recover the argument by reading all passages of the book in all possible orderings and averaging by the effective action of the argument. So when an explanation given in this book concludes "the full proof will be provided in chapter 14", presumably there exists a massive phase cancellation of all the material in between, such that all of the intermediary arguments are precisely cancelled by contradictory statements, and the full logic emerges as a continuum limit. However, since pedagogical path integrals are computationally intractable, the only way to evaluate them is by Monte Carlo sampling---reading sections of the text in random intervals and looking for a statistical convergence of reason. I did precisely this, and after convergence the only statements that did not cancel exponentially were the footnotes saying "See Weinberg for details".

On a side note, the well-mixedness of this book shows that it has very high entropy. Thus, by standard thermodynamical arguments, the amount of useful work that can be derived from it is very small.

Of course, this does not prove that the book violates causality---only that it must violate causality if it is to make any sense at all. The proof that it does violate causality will be presented in point (3), below.

2) The notation is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian
It is well established that the notation and terminology of QFT is massive. However, it appears that the author of this text has elected to use parity eigenstates of notation, which in the presence of a mass term are no longer eigenstates of the entire Hamiltonian. Thus, the text exhibits flavor oscillations of notation, with e.g. upper indices rotating into lower indices on a periodicity of about 2 pages. This is unobservable for Euclidean field theories, where no experiment can measure the sign of a index, but in Minkowski space it causes the vacuum to become unstable: Plus signs can spontaneously decay into minus signs, resulting in non-local perturbations to the state of confusion, and what mathematicians call a "catastrophe".

3) The logic can be off-shell.
The introduction to this text advertises "mathematical rigor". However, it fails to mention that this rigor is of a very peculiar sort that requires the propagation of non-physical "ghost logic" that is not quantized in integer units of trueness. Admittedly this is very useful for QFT, as it allows one to make fully rigorous arguments using advanced techniques like "proof by assumption", "proof by assertion", "proof by failure to find a counter-argument", "proof by guessing", and "proof by citing Weinberg". In all these cases, one postulates the existence of a mathematical structure which trivializes the action of the details of a theory, propagates the logic (in an unphysical, off-shell way) to a state which is known (or will be shown in a future chapter) to be consistent with experiment, and then shows that since no experiment can distinguish this theory from reality, it must be unphysical. Since it is unphysical, no experiment can distinguish a bogus argument in this theory from a non-bogus argument, and thus we may make all the bogus arguments we want with no energy cost, and as long as the net bogus is exactly zero, it must be gauge-equivalent to a valid argument with the same result. This "advanced" argument may sound like circular reasoning, since moving forwards in time we do not know that the mathematical details are true until they are known to be true, but it is preferable to think about it (in a Feynman-Stuckelberg interpretation) as a retarded anti-argument travelling backwards in time. (By the way, recall that statement about causality that I mentioned above without proving? This provides the promised proof!) If you find this confusing, try to find a counter-example, and convince yourself that it's impossible to argue with this logic.

4) The explanations are non-perturbative.
If you take the off-shell logicons for granted, the arguments presented in this text are perfectly plausible. For example, the occasional trick "guess the solution and check that it's consistent to first order" works very well in all the cases considered in the book. However, if you try to perturb such reasoning, you find that it almost immediately fails (for example, in some of the exercises). This strong coupling is presumably due to renormalization of higher order non-causal proof loops: if you naively try to integrate a non-causal, off-shell logicon into your own argument, you will find that there is a diverging quantum of strangeness to the logic. Since all eigenstates with non-zero strangeness are at best metastable, in order to have your argument not decay long before you finish your proof, you must introduce an ultraviolate cutoff on how hard you think about any arguments presented in this text. This is physically justified by the fact that the microscopic details of the logic consists of (something gauge-equivalent to) a bunch of bogusons and anti-bogusons anyway, which are clearly unphysical. Since we don't understand the microscopic details, we must integrate out the detailed logic, resulting in the observed strong coupling of the text's arguments. Consequently, the only way to proceed in general is again with non-perturbative approaches, summing the contributions of all possible instantons, insistantons, incessantons, cessantons, carryons, tackons, walkons, neurons, rambleons, rambleons, rambleons, and (of course) all possible reasons. After carrying out the computations, I was left with a remarkably elegant solution: See Weinberg for details.

OK, seriously now: My background with this book was in the context of a standard graduate QFT sequence at a top U.S. physics research university. The first quarter of the sequence was based entirely on Schwartz and successive quarters were based on a mix of Schwartz, Peskin & Schroeder, and a little Weinberg. This was the first year Schwartz was used here. My conclusion is that Schwartz is the worst book to learn from of the bunch. Since this review is at variance with many other reviews here, I will conjecture that the root of the disagreement is that the other reviewers seem to have been already well familiar with QFT before picking up Schwartz---I was not. Indeed, I think Schwartz probably provides a valuable fresh perspective on QFT for those who are already old hands at the subject, but it is not so useful as an introduction to the subject. The essential issue may be the text's sloppiness, examples of which are contained in my 4 points above. E.g. the indices (point 2) really do fly around all over the place, which I think most practitioners of this field would agree is poor practice. Of course, this on its own wouldn't spoil the book. A more authoritative criticism came from the instructors I had: During the classes I took, both a TA and a professor separately made statements to the effect "Yeah, Schwartz doesn't tell you everything you need to know." It was recommended to me on several points that I supplement the presentation of Schwartz with that of Peskin & Schroeder or Weinberg. For a beginning student, that completely defeats the purpose of using Schwartz in the first place. And after reading those supplements, I agree that the treatment of other texts is superior.

Schwartz does have some valuable additions to the QFT textbook arsenal---a prime example being his inclusion of spinor helicity formalism---but this doesn't make up for the pedagogical faults. So summarily: If your only interest is to get a hand-wavy, whirlwind tour of modern QFT, this book may do you good. If you are a lecturer looking for new ways to present the subject, this book may do you good. If you are a student trying to learn QFT for the first time, forget this book---go with Peskin & Schroeder or (preferably) Weinberg. MOST IMPORTANTLY: IF YOU ARE A PROFESSOR LOOKING FOR A TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR QFT COURSE, DO NOT USE SCHWARTZ. Another reviewer has called this book the "new standard". It is not. Peskin & Schroeder (despite its imperfections) or Weinberg are still the standards.
38 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


From other countries

simon alford
3.0 out of 5 stars Book was damaged, and sold as such.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on February 18, 2022
Verified Purchase
Appeared to be water damage fastening pages together. Careful prising apart meant all pages were legible. So no need to return it. £20 cheaper.
Report
Amazon Customer
2.0 out of 5 stars Book Binding is poor
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on September 9, 2019
Verified Purchase
Paper quality is ordinary and hard binder is not glued well.(I have stuck it back with fevicol, it's ok now)

Rating is not for the content in the book.
Customer image
Amazon Customer
2.0 out of 5 stars Book Binding is poor
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on September 9, 2019
Paper quality is ordinary and hard binder is not glued well.(I have stuck it back with fevicol, it's ok now)

Rating is not for the content in the book.
Images in this review
Customer image
Customer image
6 people found this helpful
Report
Daniel Hofmann
2.0 out of 5 stars Ware beschädigt angekommen
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on December 9, 2020
Verified Purchase
Das Buch ist inhaltlich gut. Allerdings kam es beschädigt (siehe Bilder) an. Was für ein Taschenbuch vielleicht noch OK wäre, ist für ein hochpreisiges Fachbuch ein go.
Customer image
Daniel Hofmann
2.0 out of 5 stars Ware beschädigt angekommen
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on December 9, 2020
Das Buch ist inhaltlich gut. Allerdings kam es beschädigt (siehe Bilder) an. Was für ein Taschenbuch vielleicht noch OK wäre, ist für ein hochpreisiges Fachbuch ein go.
Images in this review
Customer image Customer image
Customer imageCustomer image
One person found this helpful
Report
Translate review to English
Françoise
2.0 out of 5 stars La QFT traitée de manière superficielle
Reviewed in France 🇫🇷 on November 12, 2017
Verified Purchase
Ceux qui cherchent une compréhension profonde de la QFT (conceptuellement très délicate), passez votre chemin. La manière sur-pédagogique de présenter les concepts tend vers la vulgarisation, et ne s'appuie pas sur des démonstrations mathématiques claires (qui, bien qu'un peu longues, ne sont pas si compliquées : mieux vaut quelques formules qu'un paragraphe de texte obscur). Bref, j'ai souvent du ouvrir le Weinberg pour compenser le manque de rigueur de ce livre.
One person found this helpful
Report
Translate review to English
  • ←Previous page
  • Next page→

Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • Careers
  • Amazon Newsletter
  • About Amazon
  • Accessibility
  • Sustainability
  • Press Center
  • Investor Relations
  • Amazon Devices
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Sell products on Amazon
  • Sell apps on Amazon
  • Supply to Amazon
  • Protect & Build Your Brand
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Become a Delivery Driver
  • Start a Package Delivery Business
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Self-Publish with Us
  • Host an Amazon Hub
  • ›See More Ways to Make Money
Amazon Payment Products
  • Amazon Visa
  • Amazon Store Card
  • Amazon Secured Card
  • Amazon Business Card
  • Shop with Points
  • Credit Card Marketplace
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Amazon Currency Converter
Let Us Help You
  • Amazon and COVID-19
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Your Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • Help
English
United States
Amazon Music
Stream millions
of songs
Amazon Advertising
Find, attract, and
engage customers
6pm
Score deals
on fashion brands
AbeBooks
Books, art
& collectibles
ACX
Audiobook Publishing
Made Easy
Sell on Amazon
Start a Selling Account
 
Amazon Business
Everything For
Your Business
Amazon Fresh
Groceries & More
Right To Your Door
AmazonGlobal
Ship Orders
Internationally
Home Services
Experienced Pros
Happiness Guarantee
Amazon Ignite
Sell your original
Digital Educational
Resources
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
 
Audible
Listen to Books & Original
Audio Performances
Book Depository
Books With Free
Delivery Worldwide
Box Office Mojo
Find Movie
Box Office Data
ComiXology
Thousands of
Digital Comics
DPReview
Digital
Photography
Fabric
Sewing, Quilting
& Knitting
 
Goodreads
Book reviews
& recommendations
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
IMDbPro
Get Info Entertainment
Professionals Need
Kindle Direct Publishing
Indie Digital & Print Publishing
Made Easy
Amazon Photos
Unlimited Photo Storage
Free With Prime
Prime Video Direct
Video Distribution
Made Easy
 
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
Amazon Warehouse
Great Deals on
Quality Used Products
Whole Foods Market
America’s Healthiest
Grocery Store
Woot!
Deals and
Shenanigans
Zappos
Shoes &
Clothing
Ring
Smart Home
Security Systems
 
eero WiFi
Stream 4K Video
in Every Room
Blink
Smart Security
for Every Home
Neighbors App
Real-Time Crime
& Safety Alerts
Amazon Subscription Boxes
Top subscription boxes – right to your door
PillPack
Pharmacy Simplified
Amazon Renewed
Like-new products
you can trust
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
© 1996-2023, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates