I'm sorry, but I don't think that the "scientists" on Strange Evidence have ever heard of a piece of extremely powerful software called "Avid Media Composer," because not once, in any episode (and I'm now in the 3rd season), has a single one of the many dozens of videos claimed as "evidence" in this series, been questioned for authenticity. Not one. They just take them at face value. THAT is NOT scientific. Period.
Normally, like with alleged UFO footage for example, evidentiary videos are subjected to a battery of forensic tests to first see if they're real, and haven't been adulterated with software such as an Avid system. Yet these so-called scientists consider every video as the "evidence" for the event, when the very first thing ANY investigator should do with video evidence, is question the validity of that footage. They have not done that yet - in 3 seasons - not once. BELIEVE NOTHING. QUESTION EVERYTHING. (Especially in this show.)