Amazon.com: Customer reviews: The Lost World
Skip to main content
.us
Hello Select your address
All
Select the department you want to search in
Hello, Sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Disability Customer Support Best Sellers Amazon Basics New Releases Customer Service Today's Deals Prime Books Music Amazon Home Registry Fashion Handmade Kindle Books Gift Cards Toys & Games Amazon Explore Sell Automotive Coupons Pharmacy Computers Luxury Stores Home Improvement Beauty & Personal Care Pet Supplies Shopper Toolkit Video Games Health & Household Smart Home

  • The Lost World
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
6,203 global ratings
5 star
79%
4 star
15%
3 star
5%
2 star
1%
1 star
1%
The Lost World

The Lost World

byMichael Crichton
Write a review
How customer reviews and ratings work

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 starsSci-Fi Animal-Horror Reveals Truths about Humanity?
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2019
After reading the second Jurassic Park book, it really hit me how Crichton, at least in this series (since I haven't read anything else from him yet), has a wonderful way of making the stories about more than just the individual events happening. There's an overarching theme to the story about how humanity relates to nature and how humanity is part of nature. It sounds trite, but it's hard to describe the way the book handles it. All I can say is that I came out of reading both of the Jurassic books feeling oddly better and less fatalistic about humanity's ultimate impact on the Earth.

His characters are sometimes likable, sometimes not, sometimes survive, sometimes don't, but they're almost always complex in a way you might not expect them to be. It's rarer than people might think to find complex characters in any genre. The people and situations are real and sympathetic enough that I end up feeling equally bad when likable characters and even the most unlikable characters are killed.

I also appreciate how Crichton doesn't really demonize the animals. They may be the primary danger in the books, but they're not evil. They're animals, but there's always a bit of a sense of curiosity and wonder mixed in with the fear. Maybe not as much as the Jurassic Park movie, but it's there. I guess you could say the animals are complex characters, just like the humans are.
Read more
24 people found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
Christian Reader
2.0 out of 5 starsDon’t waste your time. Watch the movie instead.
Reviewed in the United States on June 10, 2020
Actually, I liked the movie better. This is unusual. I usually prefer the book to the movie. However, in this case, it is the opposite. This book has too much “preaching” about evolution. And, as a Christian who believes the Bible is God’s Holy Word, I found it sad that the author actually thinks everything happened by chance. I enjoyed the action scenes. If he had left off the constant droning on and on about theories about where we came from it would have been a great action filled book. As it was, if you skip 80% of the book and just read the action story you can enjoy it. Sorry.
Read more
29 people found this helpful

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
All reviewers
4 star only
Text, image, video
Filtered by
4 starClear filter
987 total ratings, 272 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

Sarah T
4.0 out of 5 stars Dinosaurs, prions, and thieving geneticists
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2020
Verified Purchase
I first read this book around 1996. I reread this in 2020, and my memory of the book had long been overridden by the Lost World movie, which has a little in common with this book. I also read Arthur Conan Doyle’s Lost World (from 1912) right before rereading this book, and Lost World Jurassic Park is thankfully much less racist than that one.

This sequel to Jurassic Park was not as exciting or as fun as the original Jurassic Park, but it was still good. The plot focuses on several scientists/teachers/professors: Thorne, a wealthy retired professor who now builds highly complex RVs, Richard Levine, a paleontologist, Sarah Harding, a carnivorous animal behavior specialist of some sort, and Ian Malcolm, who we all thought was killed off in the original Jurassic Park (or at least that is what JP book says), but has somehow recovered and is now back to being a mathematics professor. The book also has two children tag along, perhaps as an effort to convince parents that the future movie version of Lost World was family friendly and meant for kids, Arby and Kelly. Past me might have said the kids are annoying and shouldn’t be included, but I actually found that the kids were fine and once again ended up being the much needed computer experts. I especially liked Arby, who has a complicated childhood as an only child with professional yet mostly absentee parents. (Your mileage may vary – the movie version of kids I think was rolled into one child who may or may not have been a little annoying. The kids in the book were fine with me.)

The plot focuses on Thorne, Malcolm, and Eddie Carr, an engineer, (and the kids, hiding in the RV) traveling to Isla Sorna (Site B) to rescue Dr. Levine. Sarah Harding shows up a few hours later, to join in the rescue attempt, by hitching a ride with geneticist Lewis Dodgson (the guy who was trying to steal the Dino embryos in the first Jurassic Park book). Dodgson, along with two other colleagues, is still trying to get his own dinos by stealing eggs.

Site B was the breeding laboratory for dinosaurs that were then transferred to Jurassic Park, and like most things involving genetics, there was a lot of trial and error before getting things right. This site was abandoned after the whole InGen was shut down after the every of Jurassic Park, and many dinosaurs got out and are now living and breeding on the island (this is background, not part of the actual book plot, although I would read that book).

The plot mostly focuses on a.) finding Dr. Levine, b.) studying the behavior of dinosaurs in the “wild”, c.) understanding what is causing the dinos to act more erratic than usual , d.) surviving, and e.) not being killed off by “the bad guys”. The bad guys were never really a threat to anyone except Sarah Harding on the boat, and unlike the movie, there wasn’t a whole troop of guys with guns trying to kill the dinosaurs, mostly just Dodgson, who was trying to steal eggs.

Since I’ve just read A.C. Doyle’s Lost World, I would like to mention that Crichton’s Lost World has many more dinosaurs, fewer highly problematic “ape-men” (none), and was a whole lot less racist. I thought Isla Sorna having sheer cliffs making an entrance or exit to the island hazardous was similar to Doyle’s Lost World plateau, but there were not that many similarities between the two. The only small criticism for this book is that the ending seemed anti-climatic to me. There are no big discoveries (other than prion disease, which I had no idea what I prion was when I was 15-16 years old reading this book, but I do now), no big resolutions. This book did not seem that suspenseful, and I was never that worried for most of the protagonists, but that might be because I’ve already read this book and seen the movie.

All the familiar dinosaurs from Jurassic Park are back – T-rexes, hadrosaurs, velociraptors, triceratops, as well as a pair of camouflaging predators that can match their backgrounds like chameleons or octopi. Is this a feature of the Indominous Rex in Jurassic World? I’m not sure.

Lost World Jurassic Park was fun, escapism fiction for me, and I’m glad I reread it. I struggle with some of Crichton’s later works, when scientists somehow are always the “bad guys”, climate-change denial runs rampant (State of Fear), evil scientists are working on human-chimp hybrids (Next), and I don’t even remember what scientists did wrong in Micro, only that almost all of them were killed off in horrific ways. Those books turned me off to Crichton’s work in general. But, after rereading this one, I think I might continue my reread of Michael Crichton. The two Jurassic Park novels may well be the first science fiction books I ever read, and I have a special place in my heart for these two books.
8 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


E. Pfeifer
4.0 out of 5 stars Not like the movie! Better!
Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2018
Verified Purchase
Was expecting some relation between this book and the movie, but I was wrong. The book could be concidered a completely different situation and story from the movie. Sure some characters are the same and equipment might be the same but everything else is different in a good way. The book makes it seem if you've watched the movie you'll know what to expect in the book. Not here! The author keeps it interesting till the end. Glad I read the book after seeing the movie or I would not have liked the movie. I only knocked one star off because of the over explaining of certain things that don't contribute to much.
29 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Boomer
TOP 500 REVIEWER
4.0 out of 5 stars A worthy sequel
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2020
Verified Purchase
Awesome book. It's not often you find sequels that match the originals, and this novel achieves that. Ian Malcolm leads a team to the island of Isla Sorna - Ingen's "Site B" - to rescue a colleague. At the same time Ingen's rival company Biosyn sends their own team led by the nefarious Lewis Dodgson to retrieve fertilized dinosaur eggs from the numerous nesting grounds around the island in an attempt to boost their own research.

The story is fast paced with plenty of action scenes and some great characters. The fact that Richard Levine, Doc Thorne, and Arby didn't make it in to the movie adaptation is a crime. Dodgson is a suitably despicable villain and besides the usual raptors there's another species of dinosaur which feels even more threatening, despite the fact that they have a very limited presence.

As with the original there's a lot of scientific theory interlaced within the fast moving story, but it was done in such a way as it didn't hold things up much. Thoroughly enjoyed this book.
8 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Jordash386
4.0 out of 5 stars ... book I found the book to be so much better than the movie adaptation which really isn't even similar
Reviewed in the United States on October 18, 2018
Verified Purchase
Having watched the movie and not read the book I found the book to be so much better than the movie adaptation which really isn't even similar. Crichton's books are so fun, but make you feel like you are reading something education that will make you smarter. Malcolm is a much more satisfying character in the books.
8 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Tacitus R Low
4.0 out of 5 stars A Worthy Sequel
Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 2022
Verified Purchase
Once again, Michael Crichton writes a great book. As with Jurassic Park (the book), the Lost World (the book) fills in all the gaps left by the movies. Everything about the plot starts to make more sense when you read the books.

Which book is better, Jurassic Park or the Lost World? I would say both books are about the same level of quality, and I like both books immensely.

Are the books better than the movies? They are different. The movies have less content, and because of that, the plots do not make as much logical sense. But some scenes from the movies are better than the scenes from the books, and vice versa. I think the scenes involving the tyrannosaurs are mostly better in the movies (although the books do have some interesting tyrannosaurus rex scenes. The books make the tyrannosaurs seem more like real animals, while the tyrannosaurs in the movies are more like Godzilla type monsters). The book mostly has better scenes involving the raptors. The compsognathus scenes from the books are mostly better, although the compsognathus scene from the Lost World movie where Dieter gets attacked and killed by the compsognathuses is a great action scene. The movies are of course more action driven, and less logical. The books are more logical, less action oriented, and provide much more information about dinosaurs. I would say both the movies and the books are both great for different reasons. If you love the movies, you will love the books too.

I guess the only real issue I have with the Lost World book is thar it seems utterly incomprehensible that Biosyn would be so inadequately prepared for a mission to Isla Sorna. Nevertheless, this is believable I suppose, because of Lewis Dodgson's arrogance. In contrast to the movies where Ian Malcolm's team seems rather unprepared, they are actually quite well prepared in the book. So this fact sort of makes up for the fact that Biosyn is not well prepared in the book. It also makes infinitely more sense that Biosyn is sending a mission to Isla Sorna instead of InGen. In the book, InGen has gone bankrupt. So some aspects of the plot of the book are more believable than the plot of the movie. Overall, I have very few criticisms about the Lost World or Jurassic Park books. They are both well written and entertaining books.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


EOD Phil
4.0 out of 5 stars Better than the movie
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2022
Verified Purchase
I've loved Jurassic Park since I was 12 and read the first book. Soon after, I watched the first movie. I've seen all the movies, and look forward to Dominion, but I never read the true sequel. I'm glad I finally have. It defeated the film in every way. I wish the movie has been faithful. With the exception of some character names, the wounded baby T-rex, and the trailers pushed over the cliff by the parents, nothing is the same. I'm glad the new movie will have Dodgson. He was a great villain.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Wendy Liau
4.0 out of 5 stars The Lost World Review: Summary, Yahs and Nahs...
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2011
Verified Purchase
"`What if the dinosaurs did not become extinct? What if they still exist? Somewhere in an isolated spot on the planet.'"
"You're talking about a Lost World". (Page 5)

The theory of a "Lost World" is a well-defined way of thinking about evolution. It is, of course, only a theory. That is, until Dr. Levine from Berkeley University hears rumors of large animals, perhaps even dinosaurs that serves as evidence of a literal lost world where dinosaurs still live. With the help of Dr. Malcolm, a mathematician; Sarah Harding, a field biologist; Dr. Thorne, an engineer; and surprisingly, two seventh grade kids: Arby and Kelly, Levine launches an expedition to look for the Lost World. But despite tireless calculations and planning, the expedition goes terribly wrong...

I must admit that I was a little disappointed with "The Lost World". I expected a flawless, fast-paced book because of its predecessor, "Jurassic Park", which was suspenseful, gruesome, and a page-turner. And although "The Lost World" kept me reading at times, other times it was slow paced and easy to put down during the scientific explanations of "Chaos Theory", or "Evolution". The book was definitely more educating than "Jurassic Park", which definitely contributed to the slow paced factor of the book when it stopped dead at times. '

Despite that, this book had a lot of ingenious cliff-hangers, especially when the book changed from one person's point of view, to another. Author Michael Crichton cuts scenes off and changes the point of view just as the climax of the scene approaches: "He felt a heavy weight suddenly tear at his backpack, forcing him to his knees in the mud, and he realized in that moment that despite all his planning, despite all his clever deductions, things had gone terribly wrong, and he was about to die" (Page 37). This ends a section of the book, and changes to the point of view of Kelly: a seventh grade girl. The scene is set on an ordinary, boring day at school during a lecture: "`When we consider mass extinction from a meteor impact,' Richard Levine said, `we must ask several questions.'" (Page 38) This contrast drives you crazy because the adrenaline one scene, and the calmness of the next, which leaves you hanging and keeps you reading.

If you are looking for an action-packed, educating science fiction novel that has many surprises and unexpected results, I would definitely suggest reading "The Lost World".
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


FoxysMom
4.0 out of 5 stars Great adventure, just don't think too hard
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
Verified Purchase
Ian Malcolm, presumed dead at the end of Jurassic Park, is alive and giving a lecture on Chaos Theory and Extinction when overzealous paleontologist Richard Levine shows up. Levine is tired of studying bones; he’s heard rumors about strange animals in Costa Rica and about Ian Malcolm’s extended stay there. He wants to put together an expedition to locate a “Lost World” where animals survived extinction and are still living in seclusion. Malcolm says no such place exists, but he’ll be happy to help if it’s ever found. As Levine begins to track down the last known rumored site of his Lost World he realizes he’s being monitored and all his careful planning means nothing if he isn’t the first one there. Lewis Dodgson is back and he wants what he paid for: dinosaur eggs. Levine rushes unprepared into the Lost World, forcing Malcolm to organize a rescue party…

This was certainly an interesting sequel, although I think it lacked the focus of the first novel. I loved that not one, but two children managed to stowaway on the trailer and, unlike the movie, neither one of them were related to Malcolm. Because in a world where genetically engineered dinosaurs roam free, who needs the added drama of teenagers fighting with absentee dads? I liked that it was, to some degree, Richard Levine’s fault that the kids got dragged into this. Levine’s blind ambition, disregard for human life, and pomposity makes him a hard guy to like; so it’s easier to place blame on an unlikable character than the guy everyone liked from Jurassic Park. But in turn, Ian Malcolm was a little less likeable this time around. His character has had a complete overhaul. Instead of being the know-it-all pessimist who just knows this is a bad idea and wants to spend all his time explaining why… He’s curious. He thinks that somehow studying dinosaurs outside cages will be less dangerous than when they were in them. This is a man who thought dinosaurs were a bad idea before they tried to eat him. Clearly the blood loss from his previous stay in Costa Rica has damaged his brain.

Crichton’s characters reunite on the island of Isla Sorna, surprised to find that evidence of human intervention is all around them. This is Site B: InGen’s top secret manufacturing plant. The scientists, unable to stop disease from spreading, released their wards to grow in the wild; offering Levine and Malcolm the unique chance to study dino-behavior. I found most of the explanations as to why dinosaurs behaved a certain way fun, but found it laughable that it never once occurs to anyone throughout the course of the book to sit still, shut up, stay together until the helicopters returned…Although I suppose if they behaved themselves the plot would be about a bunch of people sitting in a tree. The only thing I didn’t like about dinosaur behavior and its explanation: velociraptors as bad parents. The reason given for this is that they were raised in a lab and never learned mothering behavior…But the same could be said for any of the dinosaurs and the other species managed just fine. So that explanation fell short. I suspect it was easier to vilify raptors when they were turning on each other and instead of trying to give an explanation for that behavior, MC should have just left it alone. But I loved the idea of chameleon carnitaurs and feathered T-rex babies. The descriptions of scenery and wildlife were beautifully done and it made up for the parts that made no sense.

This book was dramatically different from its movie. The first half of the storyline is spent searching for Levine who is searching for dinosaurs. Sarah Harding is late to the party, not early. Dodgson does not arrive with a mini-army so you kind of know his chances of success aren’t going to be high. The T-Rex’s never get off the island. In the end, the book and the movie only ever share two scenes: 1. the kidnap of a baby T-Rex and 2. the raptors hunting human prey through long grass. Needless to say, if you're a fan of this book you don't need to see the movie...If you're a fan of this movie you're in for a surprise.

While I enjoyed this book enough to give it a four star rating, I’m not ashamed to admit I prefer the flashy thrills of the movie version. Bogging the story down with all that science and speculation gave me way too much time to think about all the plot-holes even as the suspense pulled me forward through the pages…
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Kindle Customer USA
4.0 out of 5 stars Good buy
Reviewed in the United States on September 17, 2019
Verified Purchase
There were some sections I skimmed through because they were overly verbose, but overall I really enjoyed this book. A great sequel which did a great job of explaining some of the plot holes of the previous installment with mild comedy.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Kindle Customer
4.0 out of 5 stars Better than the first
Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2021
Verified Purchase
The strong female character in Sarah Harding is a breath of fresh air. I do not want to give away anything...read!!!
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


  • ←Previous page
  • Next page→

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

Ask
Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question.
Please enter a question.

Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for The Lost World

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • Careers
  • Amazon Newsletter
  • About Amazon
  • Sustainability
  • Press Center
  • Investor Relations
  • Amazon Devices
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Sell products on Amazon
  • Sell apps on Amazon
  • Supply to Amazon
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Become a Delivery Driver
  • Start a package delivery business
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Self-Publish with Us
  • Host an Amazon Hub
  • ›See More Ways to Make Money
Amazon Payment Products
  • Amazon Rewards Visa Signature Cards
  • Amazon Store Card
  • Amazon Secured Card
  • Amazon Business Card
  • Shop with Points
  • Credit Card Marketplace
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Amazon Currency Converter
Let Us Help You
  • Amazon and COVID-19
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Amazon Assistant
  • Help
EnglishChoose a language for shopping.
United StatesChoose a country/region for shopping.
Amazon Music
Stream millions
of songs
Amazon Advertising
Find, attract, and
engage customers
Amazon Drive
Cloud storage
from Amazon
6pm
Score deals
on fashion brands
AbeBooks
Books, art
& collectibles
ACX
Audiobook Publishing
Made Easy
Alexa
Actionable Analytics
for the Web
 
Sell on Amazon
Start a Selling Account
Amazon Business
Everything For
Your Business
Amazon Fresh
Groceries & More
Right To Your Door
AmazonGlobal
Ship Orders
Internationally
Home Services
Experienced Pros
Happiness Guarantee
Amazon Ignite
Sell your original
Digital Educational
Resources
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
 
Audible
Listen to Books & Original
Audio Performances
Book Depository
Books With Free
Delivery Worldwide
Box Office Mojo
Find Movie
Box Office Data
ComiXology
Thousands of
Digital Comics
DPReview
Digital
Photography
Fabric
Sewing, Quilting
& Knitting
Goodreads
Book reviews
& recommendations
 
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
IMDbPro
Get Info Entertainment
Professionals Need
Kindle Direct Publishing
Indie Digital & Print Publishing
Made Easy
Amazon Photos
Unlimited Photo Storage
Free With Prime
Prime Video Direct
Video Distribution
Made Easy
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
Amazon Warehouse
Great Deals on
Quality Used Products
 
Whole Foods Market
America’s Healthiest
Grocery Store
Woot!
Deals and
Shenanigans
Zappos
Shoes &
Clothing
Ring
Smart Home
Security Systems
eero WiFi
Stream 4K Video
in Every Room
Blink
Smart Security
for Every Home
Neighbors App
Real-Time Crime
& Safety Alerts
 
    Amazon Subscription Boxes
Top subscription boxes – right to your door
PillPack
Pharmacy Simplified
Amazon Renewed
Like-new products
you can trust
   
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads
© 1996-2022, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates