Amazon.com: Customer reviews: Burnt Offerings: Valancourt 20th Century Classics
Skip to main content
.us
Hello Select your address
All
Select the department you want to search in
Hello, Sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Disability Customer Support Best Sellers Amazon Basics New Releases Customer Service Today's Deals Prime Music Books Amazon Home Handmade Registry Fashion Kindle Books Gift Cards Toys & Games Automotive Coupons Sell Amazon Explore Luxury Stores Pharmacy Computers Home Improvement Beauty & Personal Care Shopper Toolkit Pet Supplies Video Games Smart Home Health & Household

  • Burnt Offerings: Valancourt 20th Century Classics
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
585 global ratings
5 star
51%
4 star
28%
3 star
15%
2 star
4%
1 star
2%
Burnt Offerings: Valancourt 20th Century Classics

Burnt Offerings: Valancourt 20th Century Classics

byRobert Marasco
Write a review
How customer reviews and ratings work

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
Amazon Customer
4.0 out of 5 starsA few flaws but overall quite good.
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2019
As much as I hate to quibble over small things, there were a few that kept jarring me out of the narrative.

First, I know it was written in 1972, when you could get by on one income, but the math does NOT hold up. They can raise a kid on one high school teacher's salary WITHOUT his needing to work every summer, with Marian only taking temp jobs to pay for luxuries?? And when they decide to look at summer homes, the price of (mild spoiler, sorry) $900 for two months is AFFORDABLE for them? Sure, it is a lot of house for the price, but that's like $5000 in 2019 money! Do you know any high school teachers who can pay that without wrecking their budget? The reader is asked to squander far too much suspension of disbelief on this nonsense far too early in the book, and for no good reason.

A less economic concern was the just-often-enough-to-bug-me moments where the point of view migrates from one character's thoughts to another and back again within the same scene. That's usually the sign of an inexperienced and untaught writer. In this case, it became less frequent as the book went on, leading me to think it may instead have been a case of a competent enough writer leaving his writing too close to a deadline and failing to go back and fix his own simple mistakes. Frustrating, that--it is a quite decent book as it stands and I can't help but wonder how much better it could have been if he had turned in a third draft instead of the first.

Another irritant was the author's constant use of "instinctively" when he means "without clear reason or planning," an action based on unanalysed motives, sure, but NOT an actual instinct (of which humans have very few, mostly concerned with startle responses to loud noises or sudden drops, that sort of thing). It's a common error, sadly, but this author does it several times per chapter! Lazy and repetitive as well as incorrect. Quite grating.

The other irritants were smaller still, nearly humorous. While the novel managed not to read as dated in any of the ways I had expected (impressive considering it was written in 1972!) some details revealed that it was obviously written by a man in an era where they did none of the housework! Marian would NEVER blow soot off the windowsill; it would spread everywhere. Anyone who had been cleaning the same apartment for nine years would KNOW that and would use a damp rag instead. I also have doubts about two quarts of milk lasting a week for four people, but who knows? Maybe they aren't fond of dairy.

All that being said, everything else about the book was completely perfect. Utterly terrifying, only a touch predictable (likely because I read too much in this genre), and there were moments even so that managed to give me a case of the heebie jeebies. Definitely worth the Kindle price (eight bucks, I think?). Glad I gave it a chance!
Read more
25 people found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
Mack Garner
2.0 out of 5 starsA stolen plot
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2021
This is a remake of The Beckoning Fair One, by Oliver Onions, once regarded as one of the best ghost stories ever. (Look it up in an Onions collection or in Great Tales of Terror and the Supernatural, THE anthology to read before The Dark Descent.). It is hard to believe that Stephen King and Company did not know the earlier story when they wrote their reviews. This book is well written, but if you have read Fair One, you pretty much know the ending from early on. I kept reading, hoping for something new, but, alas, it was not to be. This classic should be returned to the obscurity which itdeserves.
Read more
3 people found this helpful

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
All reviewers
4 star only
Text, image, video
Filtered by
4 starClear filter
162 total ratings, 34 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

Amazon Customer
4.0 out of 5 stars A few flaws but overall quite good.
Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2019
Verified Purchase
As much as I hate to quibble over small things, there were a few that kept jarring me out of the narrative.

First, I know it was written in 1972, when you could get by on one income, but the math does NOT hold up. They can raise a kid on one high school teacher's salary WITHOUT his needing to work every summer, with Marian only taking temp jobs to pay for luxuries?? And when they decide to look at summer homes, the price of (mild spoiler, sorry) $900 for two months is AFFORDABLE for them? Sure, it is a lot of house for the price, but that's like $5000 in 2019 money! Do you know any high school teachers who can pay that without wrecking their budget? The reader is asked to squander far too much suspension of disbelief on this nonsense far too early in the book, and for no good reason.

A less economic concern was the just-often-enough-to-bug-me moments where the point of view migrates from one character's thoughts to another and back again within the same scene. That's usually the sign of an inexperienced and untaught writer. In this case, it became less frequent as the book went on, leading me to think it may instead have been a case of a competent enough writer leaving his writing too close to a deadline and failing to go back and fix his own simple mistakes. Frustrating, that--it is a quite decent book as it stands and I can't help but wonder how much better it could have been if he had turned in a third draft instead of the first.

Another irritant was the author's constant use of "instinctively" when he means "without clear reason or planning," an action based on unanalysed motives, sure, but NOT an actual instinct (of which humans have very few, mostly concerned with startle responses to loud noises or sudden drops, that sort of thing). It's a common error, sadly, but this author does it several times per chapter! Lazy and repetitive as well as incorrect. Quite grating.

The other irritants were smaller still, nearly humorous. While the novel managed not to read as dated in any of the ways I had expected (impressive considering it was written in 1972!) some details revealed that it was obviously written by a man in an era where they did none of the housework! Marian would NEVER blow soot off the windowsill; it would spread everywhere. Anyone who had been cleaning the same apartment for nine years would KNOW that and would use a damp rag instead. I also have doubts about two quarts of milk lasting a week for four people, but who knows? Maybe they aren't fond of dairy.

All that being said, everything else about the book was completely perfect. Utterly terrifying, only a touch predictable (likely because I read too much in this genre), and there were moments even so that managed to give me a case of the heebie jeebies. Definitely worth the Kindle price (eight bucks, I think?). Glad I gave it a chance!
25 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


The Fictional Housewife
4.0 out of 5 stars A classic
Reviewed in the United States on October 8, 2019
Verified Purchase
I recently read Burnt Offerings by Robert Marasco. The author only wrote one other book, Parlor Games. He also wrote the long running Broadway show, Child's Play. Robert Marasco was even nominated for a Tony award. Burnt Offerings, published in 1973, is a great and unusual haunted house book. Kind of. The house isn't haunted, there are no ghosts at all. If you want something paranormal including the spirit world, this book won't do it for you. In this story, the house is alive. The Rolfe family, living in a small Brooklyn apartment, want to escape the hot city for the summer and rent an enormous home in the country. The house is stunning but run down. The family gets a super low price on rent if they will take care of the owner's mother who lives on the top floor. She never comes out and requires no care other than meals to be brought to her room, left outside the door. Seems easy enough and completely anonymous. The other thing is to spruce up the house as they want, restore the old pool, polish knickknacks, trim trees...general house puttering. As the story progresses the reader finds that the house and the Rolfes are very much connected, with the house almost feeding off the family as it begins to return to its original splendor.

This book is well written, with building (note pun) suspense, and a quick satisfying read. Disturbing in the best way, this won't have you checking under your bed, but it will make you think twice about your next rental! Enjoyable from beginning to end, this book is a statement to a great plot and writing featuring a true horror story without gore, vampires or zombies. A scantily clad girl, in high heels for no reason, running away from obvious safety can only be featured so many times before it gets old. You will find solid, plot driven, story telling at it's best here. Some things never get old.
13 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Jamie L. Henderson
4.0 out of 5 stars This obvious precursor to King’s “The Shining” is an great slow burn
Reviewed in the United States on July 4, 2019
Verified Purchase
Marasco by no means invents the haunted house that collects or feeds off its inhabitants. This book was published in 1973, over a decade after Shirley Jackson’s _The Haunting of Hill House_. However, he did bring a new take that fans of Stephen King’s _The Shining_ will instantly recognize, and likely go check the publication dates to find that _Burnt Offerings_ is the earlier novel.

This book is the story of a young family, not in deep trouble at the beginning of the novel but definitely not idyllic. Looking to find a getaway from the noise and heat of the city, they find a deal too good to be true in a secluded country mansion. The price is low enough they can afford, and the only catch is there are some rather unusual caretaker duties. Tension mounts as the house literally comes to life with the infusion of energy of the young family staying within it.

_Burnt Offerings_ is well written and builds suspense as a slow burn. In places I think it does get a little repetitive and I found myself less anxious for the next chapter and more wanting to get on with it. I did like the pacing through the “ok, things are all going to hell now” part of the book, but felt the ending was a little abrupt. It was a hard ending to pull off, though; so, I’m not entirely sure how it could have been better.

I strongly recommend you rad this if you’re a fan of _The Shining_. The influence is unmistakeable and it’s very interesting to see the choices King made when he more or less rewrote this novel in his own image, as well as the difference in tone and type of horror the two novels evoke.
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Marjorie Kaye Noble
4.0 out of 5 stars Well done and innovative in its time
Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2018
Verified Purchase
As others have noted, I can see how this novel influenced other writers-- Stephen King's The Shining and Ira Levin's Rosemary's Baby. In terms of the scare factor, the Overlook was more effective than the house/mother of Burnt Offerings. The brother and sister were very close to Roman and his wife in Rosemary's Baby and every bit as icky. Because I read those novels before this one, it's not as fresh as it would have been had I read it when it first came out. I liked the seduction of the wife by the house by offering her the illusion of "gracious living," a Town and Country life style she deemed superior to her city existence. I wish the son had been more developed so that we care more about what happens to him.

It's well written and though I didn't connect with it, if you like horror, I think it's worth your time.
10 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Elli
4.0 out of 5 stars I can see why this is a classic. It certainly was thought-provoking.
Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2021
Verified Purchase
I felt like going in this was going to be one of those over-hyped books that everyone is supposed to like. I read this with the Books of Horror Book Club, and really probably enjoyed it more than I would have if I just read through it on my own. I had more time to think and analyze some deeper meanings than I usually allow myself.

First off, yeah, it's pretty dated. We got some really bad gender roles and misogyny going on in here. Marian is pretty vain and shallow, a homemaker who is distracted by shiny objects and not that smart. Her husband is the "intellectual" and is a total dick. The old auntie is super cool. The son is completely disregarded and ignored, just there to be seen and not heard.

From SGJ's Intro "...Hungry Houses aren't complete without people to digest for seasons or decades or centuries. ...A Hungry House knows the injuries you've been nursing in secret, and it uses them against you."

There were more questions than answers in the beginning, and it was tough to get through it because of the lack of logic. If you can hang in there, it gets better after chapter 10. It's almost like it's written by a different author. There are some things that were mentioned and never reached any sort of point, but whatever.

One thing that might be interesting to note is that a 'burnt offering' is something burned as an offering to God, but I didn't see a religious connection at all until after chapter 10. If you want to see how and my thoughts on the ending, there are spoilers following.

Overall, I can see why this is a classic. It certainly was thought-provoking. If I had rated this while reading, I would have given it a 2, but it left me thinking about it, so it deserves more. The movie stayed pretty true until that gloriously laughable ending. If you haven't seen that, you should. It's fantastic.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Danny
4.0 out of 5 stars but this is not a child-in-jeopardy story like King's early works
Reviewed in the United States on September 15, 2017
Verified Purchase
By now I've become numb to many of the things that frightened me when I first read Poe or Jackson or King, and so to an extent Burnt Offerings seems a little dated and mild. But it wasn't when it was new and it still reads as a disturbing account of a family's descent into the maelstrom of evil that they find themselves descending into. It is very much a story of a house that is terrifying not because it is ghost-filled but because it is an entity, which a house certainly is not supposed to be. It has more of a feel of the apartment building in Rosemary's Baby, perhaps. The story contains only a handful of characters, one of whom is a young boy, but this is not a child-in-jeopardy story like King's early works. It remains somewhat unique in categorization, and its ambiguity ultimately adds to its power. I hope to be able to read it a second time, for I admit I got caught up in its even occasionally and rushed ahead. That was due as much to being scared (OK, it is scary) as to being impatient. So there you go.
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Mac6uffin
4.0 out of 5 stars Another slow burn haunted house story
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2019
Verified Purchase
Very heavy on atmosphere and creepiness, and light on actual scares; this early seminal 70s horror novel has a large influence on the genre - the Bad Place that traps you and destroys you. In this case, a young family and marriage disintegrate after they find a steal (red flag!) of a bargain looking for a summer place to get away from NYC. The owners seem intent on convincing them to take it (red flag!). The dilapidated place begins to mysteriously improve (red flag!) while the family falls apart (red flag!) and a never-seen matriarch (red flag!) hides in a suite of rooms behind an unusual door (red flag!). The only horror the author ever wrote, this one novel stands above other writers entire horror careers.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Jamie Davis
4.0 out of 5 stars Classic horror
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2020
Verified Purchase
I think the movie was actually better than the book! The chaffeur scenes were KILLER, although the book kind of gave a little bit more of the background, as to it being one of Ben's childhood nightmares, I guess. Sort of "The Shining-esque."
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


P. Whoody
4.0 out of 5 stars An author from New York, writes about characters from New York.. okay...
Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2016
Verified Purchase
Okay, the characters - except for Aunt Elizabeth- maybe, are just unlikeable. Period.

Marian is a house wife, that isn't exactly the independent woman type. She is basically a vapid stereotypical female that p**sy whips the husband to the point he can't make a decision and stick to it. She's cunning manipulative, extremely materialistic, self-involved, sits at home all day doing housework, and rules the roost. She decides it's that time of the year for a summer vacation, since Ben is a school teacher and has 3 months off. She looks in the magazine ads, finds this one in particular, talks to the owner and becomes hell-bent on renting the place. No matter what weak objections her husband may have, she wants that rental, by gawd.

Even though she's not paying for the stupid place (that's right friends and neighbors, she's not even employed), she pouts, withholds sexual favors, does the cold shoulder routine, and distances herself from her weak willed husband, until finally she gets her way. This type of maneuver has been proven unsuccessful in 2016. Just ask Jada Pinkett if worked for the Oscars.

Then we have Ben. yes.. him. Obviously, the poor guy will never be half the man his mother was.

The weak-willed, classic passive-aggressive school teaching whipped husband who loves Marian soooooo much, that he is willing to give her his complete devotion - even though it's obvious that if his belly was on fire, and she had a glass of water - she'd drink it instead. "Sacrifice" and "honor" are not in her vocabulary.

I truly wonder why he was even in the story. Oh yeah, Antagonist Protagonist, victim, etc.

She finally gets her way - unlike Jada - and they go to the house and interview the couple and the handy man. From the interview with the "eccentric" brother and sister, to the very end of the book. There is basically no more reality.

These are NEW YORKERS, people.. NEW YORKERS!! Anyone who's visited New York, Jersey or the Statue of Liberty, knows for a gold-plated fact that if a couple from NEW YORK came out and interviewed these two nut cases, they would have jumped back into the car faster than a horse could trot, pulled the fastest K-turn in the history of stunt driving, and drove NASCAR style out of that driveway without looking back.

It's obvious that Stephen King used this book for his novel, The Shining. The only difference was the family was "snowed in" and couldn't get out of the Overlook hotel. He was a much more sagacious author, by having Wendy the anti-hero-wife, stop the insanity by calling out her husband on his deception, and trying to get her and her son out of that place and damn near murders Jack in the process.

Not in this book. Most school teachers are SMART.. Nope.. not Ben from NEW YORK! Aunt Elizabeth dies in the house. That would have sent families high-tailing it out of there without a second glance back, while calling in coverage on the 6:00 news. Obviously? Marian could have cared less if Ben and Dave dove off the Empire State building together. And she didn't really give a flying falafel about Aunt Elizabeth kicking the bucket either.

They leave the house, and go to the funeral - she stays and gets a great perm and dye job by the house. (Her hair turns white).

Now, on all counts. This is where the book should have ended. Davey and Ben leave the twice-possessed wife. (House-possessed and self-absorbed).. But they re-pack their suitcases and COME BACK TO THE HOUSE, knowing full well, that Marian was longer that into him. He should know? He took enough cold showers to prove it.

The story gets pretty predictable after that and well written. The author draaaaaaaaaaaaags out the end with great flourish, and we have a horror story that inspired and made lots of money for Stephen King's novel and movie.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Melissa M. McGough
4.0 out of 5 stars A little confused
Reviewed in the United States on July 19, 2020
Verified Purchase
This book was well written overall, but the ending was just a little confusing. Having seen the movie first, I was expecting this to be more brutal and abrupt but it was definitely just more with implications of doom.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


  • ←Previous page
  • Next page→

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

Ask
Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question.
Please enter a question.
See 1 answered question

Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Burnt Offerings: Valancourt 20th Century Classics

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • Careers
  • Amazon Newsletter
  • About Amazon
  • Sustainability
  • Press Center
  • Investor Relations
  • Amazon Devices
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Sell products on Amazon
  • Sell apps on Amazon
  • Supply to Amazon
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Become a Delivery Driver
  • Start a package delivery business
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Self-Publish with Us
  • Host an Amazon Hub
  • ›See More Ways to Make Money
Amazon Payment Products
  • Amazon Rewards Visa Signature Cards
  • Amazon Store Card
  • Amazon Secured Card
  • Amazon Business Card
  • Shop with Points
  • Credit Card Marketplace
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Amazon Currency Converter
Let Us Help You
  • Amazon and COVID-19
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Amazon Assistant
  • Help
EnglishChoose a language for shopping.
United StatesChoose a country/region for shopping.
Amazon Music
Stream millions
of songs
Amazon Advertising
Find, attract, and
engage customers
Amazon Drive
Cloud storage
from Amazon
6pm
Score deals
on fashion brands
AbeBooks
Books, art
& collectibles
ACX
Audiobook Publishing
Made Easy
Alexa
Actionable Analytics
for the Web
 
Sell on Amazon
Start a Selling Account
Amazon Business
Everything For
Your Business
Amazon Fresh
Groceries & More
Right To Your Door
AmazonGlobal
Ship Orders
Internationally
Home Services
Experienced Pros
Happiness Guarantee
Amazon Ignite
Sell your original
Digital Educational
Resources
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
 
Audible
Listen to Books & Original
Audio Performances
Book Depository
Books With Free
Delivery Worldwide
Box Office Mojo
Find Movie
Box Office Data
ComiXology
Thousands of
Digital Comics
DPReview
Digital
Photography
Fabric
Sewing, Quilting
& Knitting
Goodreads
Book reviews
& recommendations
 
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
IMDbPro
Get Info Entertainment
Professionals Need
Kindle Direct Publishing
Indie Digital & Print Publishing
Made Easy
Amazon Photos
Unlimited Photo Storage
Free With Prime
Prime Video Direct
Video Distribution
Made Easy
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
Amazon Warehouse
Great Deals on
Quality Used Products
 
Whole Foods Market
America’s Healthiest
Grocery Store
Woot!
Deals and
Shenanigans
Zappos
Shoes &
Clothing
Ring
Smart Home
Security Systems
eero WiFi
Stream 4K Video
in Every Room
Blink
Smart Security
for Every Home
Neighbors App
Real-Time Crime
& Safety Alerts
 
    Amazon Subscription Boxes
Top subscription boxes – right to your door
PillPack
Pharmacy Simplified
Amazon Renewed
Like-new products
you can trust
   
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads
© 1996-2022, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates