Amazon.com: Customer reviews: Celebrity
Skip to main content
.us
Hello Select your address
All
Select the department you want to search in
Hello, Sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Back to School Disability Customer Support Off to College Best Sellers Amazon Basics Today's Deals New Releases Customer Service Prime Music Books Kindle Books Amazon Home Registry Fashion Gift Cards Toys & Games Sell Handmade Amazon Explore Automotive Coupons Pharmacy Home Improvement Pet Supplies Computers Beauty & Personal Care Luxury Stores Video Games Shopper Toolkit

  • Celebrity
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
153 global ratings
5 star
65%
4 star
12%
3 star
11%
2 star
10%
1 star
2%
Celebrity

Celebrity

byLeonardo DiCaprio
Write a review
How customer reviews and ratings work

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
APC Reviews
VINE VOICE
5.0 out of 5 starsOne of Woody's best, and most under appreciated films..
Reviewed in the United States on August 9, 2008
"Celebrity" is one of Woody's best, and most under appreciated and also unjustly attacked films. The production is first rate, the characters diverse, and the acting -- from Kenneth Branagh, Judy Davis, Leonardo DiCaprio, Melanie Griffith, Joe Mantegna -- as good as in any Allen film. It is a wonderful and highly observant film, that seems to offend many for reasons that no one seems able to really express, other than by resorting to vituperative adjectives and hand wringing.

As far as I can tell, it offends some people because it is thought to be "more of the same" late "Manhattan" period Allen ensemble work -- pity Mozart if he had been cranking out symphonies for these complainers; it is thought to be annoying because Kenneth Branagh does what is, really, a wonderful Allen impression, Woody being too old by the time was made to play the lead in the story; because the characters are more fully developed, and so perhaps more subtle and less immediately amusing, versions of the classic Allen character types that, by the time the film was made, had become well known to audiences impatient for novelty and new amusements from Allen; because, perhaps, many solid middle American types have such an instinctive and deep seated hatred for the particular New York types that populate Allen films that this film evidently pushed the buttons of those audience members to extremes that mandated vicious opining in revenge; and, perhaps, last but not least, because Allen films tend to attract either comedy lovers who are put off by misanthropic elements, or misanthropes who are put off by overly human and flawed characters that don't live up to their notions of worthiness, or which make light of misanthropic virtues.

There's a reason Woody made Stardust Memories, also one of his finest films. The raging disappointment expressed by some toward his more challenging films, and to some of his more phoned in and forgettable ones, points to the creative conflict, and conflicted audience reactions, highlighted in Stardust Memories. All that aside, "Celebrity" is a marvelous film, that surely deserves a better DVD transfer than it receives here. Hopefully, when the entire Allen catalog is given a much needed 16:9 remastering someday, "Celebrity" will re-emerge and be appreciated by new audiences.
Read more
12 people found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
SaskatoonBerry
2.0 out of 5 starsA Lesser Effort to Be Sure
Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2021
As someone who has enjoyed Woody Allen's films over the years, I was surprised by how little there was to like in this film. While the list of talented actors Allen assembled was impressive, he didn't provide them with material worthy of their talents. He reduced many of the actors, especially the women, to cliches. I don't know if Allen was trying to portray the objectification of women as part of the 'Hollywood experience' but being as good a writer as he is, surely he could have made his point without actually humiliating the some of the actresses involved. Scenes with Charlize Theron, Gretchen Mol, Bebe Neuwirth and even the great Judy Davis were hard to watch. Kenneth Branagh also fared poorly, being reduced to a Woody Allen impersonation. This made me think of John Cusack who suffered a similar fate in 1991's Shadows and Fog. It comes down to the writing. Allen has made some glorious films and I'm not one to say his best work is behind him but this was definitely not his best effort. If this film was intended to be a commentary on what celebrity has come to mean, it missed the mark. Without clarity, some subtlety and sharpness, the end result was a giant waste of a great pool of talent. I expect more from Allen.
Read more
2 people found this helpful

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
All reviewers
3 star only
Text, image, video
Filtered by
3 starClear filter
23 total ratings, 16 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

Wendy Preston
3.0 out of 5 stars Not his best
Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2012
Verified Purchase
I am a Woody Allen fan, but I found this okay, not his best. Kenneth Branagh did quite a good job representing Woody Allen in the movie.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Jim J.
3.0 out of 5 stars Not One Of Woody's Best
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2008
Verified Purchase
This film included many of our best actors: they were great. However, the script lacked some of the juice of Mr. Allan's better films.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Eileen Stauss
3.0 out of 5 stars typical Woody Allen movie
Reviewed in the United States on December 28, 2012
Verified Purchase
I like Woody Allen's movies but this one not as good as most. Kenneth Branagh's character acted too much like Woody does. It was nice to see various celebrities within their own little story line, connected with Branagh's character. All in all it was an okay movie but one has to be a big Woody Allen fan to enjoy it.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


S&DH
3.0 out of 5 stars O Woody!
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2017
I watched Woody Allen's 1998 movie Celebrity again recently, starring Kenneth Branagh. I've heard for years, and know by experience, that people either love or hate Woody Allen's 'comedy'. And I've said more than a couple of times that I've been watching his movies for decades now, have found them entertaining and sometimes thought-provoking. I guess I would have counted myself as one who 'loved' his movies, or a good many of them anyway. But something has happened, and I come back to it on account of his influence on our culture.

Unlike in the earlier days when I was still wandering my way out of Arcadia with all my half-ripe thoughts, I've been afflicted in the last ten years or so with the uneasy feeling that Allen has to be observed and not merely watched for entertainment. Not that I have not always known that he was part gallows humor comedy, part dark philosophy (with more than a little quirky imitation of Ingmar Bergman, even to the point of using Bergman's famous Cinematographer, Sven Nykvist, in some films, and some of Bergman's famous actors) and, alas, part viciousness. Maybe it was his breakup with Mia Farrow and the revelation of the affair with Farrow's young daughter that finally broke the spell. He thought Farrow had a "Mother Teresa complex". All those adopted children! And Allen had no time for that kind of piety at all.

Whatever it was for me, it involved the realization that after producing his considerable opus over many decades, it was getting near the time to tally up his overall affect on the culture. And so it was then that I started to get an uneasy feeling in my stomach.

While it is true that in many of his movies he openly ruminates [obsesses] on and argues with God (like Job I thought), it is also true that in his major films another motif runs through, viz., infidelities, sundry affairs sometimes in the same movie and often enough with young bimbos; there is the dismal bondage of marriage (even when one comes to accept it as an inevitable curse); then the hypocrisy of religion, the ultimate meaninglessness of life and the apparent [tentative I hope] conclusion that one can only hope for "whatever works," whatever gets one through the night, without any meaningful reference to right or wrong. Because for Allen, so far, there is nothing else --- we all go around just once. In one movie a renowned philosopher openly pondering the problems commits suicide in the end.

Allen thus poses as a kind of pop-Zarathustra. And that can't be good. I used to think he was just raising the questions, pointing to the real conflicts in life which can beset one. But where and in what is the redemption? It's simply not there, not even in relationships. It's like he's stuck in Sartre's Being and Nothingness, 1943.

At the end of Celebrity, the Branagh character, who deliberately mimics Allen's neurotic persona and style throughout, after the formulaic infidelities [against his half-crazed Significant Other, bedeviled with "Catholic guilt"] and frustrations about not finding serial relationships the panaceas to all his existential frustrations, he finally takes refuge in a movie theater (another Allen metaphor / motif) where the final scene has a woman running away from something as a plane in the sky writes in huge letters for her (and for Allen?) HELP! The picture fades to rolling Credits.

That might sound like a potentially redemptive cry, but, alas, the movies which have come after 1998 have not changed basic course. I hope the gifted Allen has not hardened completely into stone by now. The questions and the guilt can be resolved while he still has breath. But it is getting quite late.

I'm still watching. Train wreck or redemption, we'll see. He certainly is obsessed with the "God question". And though a major motif in his movies is his trying hard to put away that question and just get lost in the carnival he wishes life to be, he is too much aware, I think, not to feel anguished, lost and longing in the mysterious shadows and fog of existence.

That's not always the worst place to be just before the lights go out for good. Anxiety sometimes leads to the truth, or at least to some sense of it.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Alfred Johnson
3.0 out of 5 stars Redux, Redux
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2008
The Chinese have their years named after various animals. Apparently this year for me is the Year of Woody Allen. For the better part of the year I have been watching, and in several cases re- watching films, that the comic has acted in, produced, directed or some combination of the three. Some have been disappointing. Some, like Annie Hall, have withstood the test of time and go into the pantheon. Others, reflecting the fact that if one lives long enough, as Allen has, then one is sure to repeat themes worked in the past, sometimes with uneven results. That is the case with Celebrity. There are some very funny individual scenes that rank with Allen classics but overall we have been here before. Allen's look at the pranks and pitfalls of celebrity in New York City (his favorite locale, and correctly so) in the mid-1990's is the updated version of his less than funny Zelig that looked at celebrity in the Jazz Age.

Moreover, the film has an overly manic quality, particularly on the part of the frustrated male writer (surprise, surprise) and his unfulfilled and bewildered schoolteacher wife soon to be separated so that said writer can `find' himself. The mannerisms (to speak nothing of a certain vague similarity of appearance) of the pair reminded me of the good old days when Woody and Mia (oops, better not mention that) held forth. Except here on speed. If you love black and white film, if you love Woody Allen and most importantly if you are new to the Allen genre then get this film. Others, veterans, can take it or leave it.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Literary Lass
3.0 out of 5 stars Fame -- It's the name of the game
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2003
Andy Warhol once intoned that we'd all be famous for 15 minutes. In Woody Allen's 1998 comedy "Celebrity," one of his characters cites that quotable quote. The unquenchable thirst for being applauded and lauded permeates this film. All of the denizens of this black-and-white NYC world gravitate toward photographers' flashbulbs, gossip column newsprint, and sound bites on entertainment TV. His cast of actresses, models, painters, writers, and producers are all jockeying to be recognizable to the public, as opposed to being recognized in their fields. It doesn't matter whether they create works of art or produce oeuvres that will be their permanent legacies--they all simply want a chance to appear on Page Six or be dished by Joan Rivers on the red carpet. (Allen shows this brilliantly during a second-rate movie premiere sequence, where Karen Duffy interviews arriving celebrities in a high-pitched, frenzied, continually growing fervor. Her hard-hitting questions of these minor celebs include insights into the weather, the rain, and the puddles. Additionally, Debra Messing makes a brief pre "Will and Grace" appearance as a bellowing banshee TV reporter. Her broadcasting is of a feverish, shouting, ear-splitting level.)
Allen, who at one time had been hailed as a comic genius, began to make serious, European-inspired films in the early 1980s. He is at his best, however, when he makes "warmedys" or "dramedys," movies that walk the tightrope of laughing out loud and meditatively exploring affairs of the heart and mind. In Allen's personal life, which always included the requisite relationship with leading ladies (Louise Lasser, Diane Keaton, Mia Farrow), he seemed to be following what is mandated of directorial types. His reputation took a violent turn downward with his secret wooing and seducing of Soon-Yi, Farrow's adopted daughter. With his callow explanation of "The heart wants what the heart wants," Allen had unwittingly joined a pantheon of fellow May-December offenders: Roman Polanski, Charlie Chaplin, Errol Flynn. It doesn't matter whether Soon-Yi was of legal age when the romance began, Allen was branded as a child grabber.
This fall from grace and the unwilling attainment of fame on a whole different level is the driving force of "Celebrity." Throughout the film, shallow models, spoiled actresses, high-strung editors, generous producers, and confused writers interact before backdrops of "The Ricki Lake Show" or "Jerry Springer." Look carefully and you'll see Joey and Mary Jo Buttafuco playing on a televison screen, and you'll catch Donald "the Donald" Trump extolling how he plans on buying up St. Patrick's Cathedral to raze it and build some dynamite condo space.
We live in a world where people become PEOPLE magazine cover stories by virtue of being kidnapped, taken hostage, or victimized in some grotesque way. We lionize interns who have achieved notoriety because of their oral skills, rather than their clerical talents. (Just the other day, a 60-plus-year-old woman has come out of the woodwork confessing to being the first First Intern, having taken advantage of executive privilege with JFK.)
Allen's movie delves into the whole culture of making a name for oneself without being able to name what one actually does. Kenneth Branagh, doing a dead-on Woody Allen impression, is a travel writer who has a midlife crisis that dictates he wants, and deserves, more than an occasional byline and tryst in bed with his long-suffering Catholic wife. Judy Davis is the aforementioned spouse, and she does a serviceable job as a woman who is convinced that she doesn't deserve happiness and any morsel of good fortune.
Along the way, the two characters separate and divorce, then become involved with lunatics and lovers played by Charlize Theron, Famke Janssen, Winona Ryder, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Joe Mantegna. Interestingly, Theron (as a self-absorbed, selfish woman who basically has become famous for wearing lingerie on a runway) utters a prior Allen line: She admits to being polymorphously perverse, being able to attain pleasure wherever she's touched. Allen uses that same adjective to describe the Keaton character in "Annie Hall." (And he uses its reverse, "polymorphously insensitive," to razz the Dianne Wiest character in "Hannah.")
Overall, "Celebrity" is not a fabulous movie. It's not consistently funny and it doesn't have the touching moments or sweetness of "Hannah and Her Sisters." This is a text-book movie to view, though, if you want to see how one of the most famous men in American cinema history pontificates about fame and the price one pays to attain it. It will also prompt you to consider whether mass adoration morally bankrupts the seeker, or is one already lacking in good character when the hungry hunt begins?
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Matthew Horner
3.0 out of 5 stars Minor Woody Allen
Reviewed in the United States on March 23, 2002
Woody Allen has been directing movies for well over thirty years. He has also been in psychoanalysis for perhaps as long, and for several years, I have suspected that the quality of his movies depends on where his angst and his neuroses are at at the time. His films are often autobiographical in nature. We have seen the same themes evolve over the years. This is often fascinating, because we see his views of these subjects change as he grows older.
Celebrity is not a major work by Allen. It is if he is in some emotional crossroads and can not pick a suitable path for the story, which makes the movie choppy. Some scenes have flashes of brilliance, while others work for Allen, but not for the audience. The acting is much less subtle than usual, which may be because the celebrity world it is set in is not known for subtlety.
Lee Simon [Kenneth Branagh] is a journalist who longs for a better life. He has had a couple of novels published. Critics trashed them both, and now Joe is convinced that the screenplay he is working on is the answer. He decides to dump his wife, Judy [Judy Davis] so that he can pursue his dreams. She falls apart, but, in a classic Allen theme, she regroups and becomes a better, happier person, while Lee continues to flounder.
Within the rather slim plot, there are vignettes about various kinds of celebrities, and these are the parts of the movie that often work best. Charlize Theron portrays a supermodel who is the walking definition of shallow. Melanie Griffin is a demented star. Leonardo Di Caprio gives a startling performance as Brandon, a self-centered brat who is America's heartthrob of the moment.
As in almost every Allen opus, the main character falls for much younger women. A new twist here is Lee's adventures with Brandon. He is no match for the recklessness, wildness and stamina of a much younger man. True to the older man / younger woman theme, Lee learnes nothing from this encounter.
People who are not familiar with the director's work will probably be turned off by Celebrity, if only because it is black and white. Those who do not like Allen will find their distaste reaffirmed. Allen fans will be diverted, but will hope that his next project will prove more on target. There is a good chance that it will be, as the director has always been hit and miss. What do you expect from an admitted neurotic?
My list of the best Woody Allen movies is as follows [in descending order]: Hannah and Her Sisters, Annie Hall, Manhattan, Crimes and Misdemeanors, Love and Death, Husbands and Wives, Zelig, Bullets Over Broadway, Manhattan Murder Mystery.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Marc A. Coignard
3.0 out of 5 stars A bit of a dissapointment.
Reviewed in the United States on September 14, 1999
Although it has some funny scenes and a great idea behind it, this movie just didn't seem to take off for me. Woody Allen has done much better in the past. Even his "Deconstructing Harry" was better than this. It was just too uneventful. I do agree that Leo DiCaprio had one of the best scense in the movie. It does show that the man can act, when given the right oppurtunity. (Although it is debatable if his small, almost un-important part was deserved of an Oscar nomination as a few reviewers have commented.) Kenneth Brannah's character was funny, but I think that actors playing the lead in Woody Allen comedies need to stop pretending they're Woody. Although I've only seen two do it, Brannah and John Cusack, I have no doubt others have as well (or will. I really hope Sean Penn doesn't try it out in this next movie!). I also wish Woody would stop giving the very talented Judy Davis such insecure, neurotic roles. I think I've seen her in three of his movies, and she seems to be the same in each. She is a beautiful and talented actress, and I think Woody should let her show it more (although I haven't seen her Oscar nominated performance in Husbands and Wives, so maybe he has at least once). Like I said, if you're a Woody fan, you might go for this. If not, don't expect a great movie. Get some of his classics instead.
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Amazon Customer
3.0 out of 5 stars Tale of the "Starstruck Underachieving Writer"
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2001
Although the movie doesn't start at this point, the storyline does. Lee, a Hollywood beat writer, skillfully portrayed by Kenneth Branagh attends his twenty year high school reunion and realizes his life is passing by uneventfully while he's married to a school teacher, Robin (Judy Davis). A divorce ensues and Lee begins searching for happiness among Hollywood's "elite". A series of fairly entertaining misadventures commence for both Lee and Robin that lend insight to the life of *Celebrities* obviously filtered through Woody Allen's glasses. Fans of both Branagh and Allen should be pleased. Some viewers will feel the pain of Branagh's character at his class reunion and thus be able to sympathize to some degree for the rest of the movie. Of course Lee is so self-serving it's amusing to wonder what Woody Allen's plot has in store for him as punishment. Great cameos abound and performances by Leonardo Dicaprio, Charlize Theron, and Famke Janssen enhance the lumbering plot immensely.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


J. Cardinale
3.0 out of 5 stars If there's nothing else to watch and you like the Wood-man
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2000
This movie is not going to fullfill anyone (even die-hard Woodie fans). I actually didn't mind the black and white if it had a purpose which it doesn't (aside from one forced joke). Kenneth Branagh was downright annoying with his impression of Woody (put something of your own into the character for God sakes). Judy Davis, although I loved her in Husbands & Wives, was a bit unwatchable in this one for some reason (maybe overacting?). And as for everyone who liked Leonardo, I thought it was further proof that he has no range as an actor and wouldn't know subltey if it hit him in the face. He's given a seen where he can smash lamps and say F**K a lot, in other words he's given a juicy role where it can appear likes he's really into it and he does it like any beginning actor would, not one original movement. The guy is horrible plain and simple. I liked Joe Mantegna a lot, very breezy and likeable and it was shot splendidly which is always nice to see. Watch it, if you have nothing else to watch, there are a few (and I mean a few) ammusing scenes (and watch for Tom Green as an extra!), but other than that, not that great a movie.
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


  • ←Previous page
  • Next page→

Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for Celebrity

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • Careers
  • Amazon Newsletter
  • About Amazon
  • Sustainability
  • Press Center
  • Investor Relations
  • Amazon Devices
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Sell products on Amazon
  • Sell apps on Amazon
  • Supply to Amazon
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Become a Delivery Driver
  • Start a package delivery business
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Self-Publish with Us
  • Host an Amazon Hub
  • ›See More Ways to Make Money
Amazon Payment Products
  • Amazon Rewards Visa Signature Cards
  • Amazon Store Card
  • Amazon Secured Card
  • Amazon Business Card
  • Shop with Points
  • Credit Card Marketplace
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Amazon Currency Converter
Let Us Help You
  • Amazon and COVID-19
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Your Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • Amazon Assistant
  • Help
EnglishChoose a language for shopping.
United StatesChoose a country/region for shopping.
Amazon Music
Stream millions
of songs
Amazon Advertising
Find, attract, and
engage customers
Amazon Drive
Cloud storage
from Amazon
6pm
Score deals
on fashion brands
AbeBooks
Books, art
& collectibles
ACX
Audiobook Publishing
Made Easy
Alexa
Actionable Analytics
for the Web
 
Sell on Amazon
Start a Selling Account
Amazon Business
Everything For
Your Business
Amazon Fresh
Groceries & More
Right To Your Door
AmazonGlobal
Ship Orders
Internationally
Home Services
Experienced Pros
Happiness Guarantee
Amazon Ignite
Sell your original
Digital Educational
Resources
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
 
Audible
Listen to Books & Original
Audio Performances
Book Depository
Books With Free
Delivery Worldwide
Box Office Mojo
Find Movie
Box Office Data
ComiXology
Thousands of
Digital Comics
DPReview
Digital
Photography
Fabric
Sewing, Quilting
& Knitting
Goodreads
Book reviews
& recommendations
 
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
IMDbPro
Get Info Entertainment
Professionals Need
Kindle Direct Publishing
Indie Digital & Print Publishing
Made Easy
Amazon Photos
Unlimited Photo Storage
Free With Prime
Prime Video Direct
Video Distribution
Made Easy
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
Amazon Warehouse
Great Deals on
Quality Used Products
 
Whole Foods Market
America’s Healthiest
Grocery Store
Woot!
Deals and
Shenanigans
Zappos
Shoes &
Clothing
Ring
Smart Home
Security Systems
eero WiFi
Stream 4K Video
in Every Room
Blink
Smart Security
for Every Home
Neighbors App
Real-Time Crime
& Safety Alerts
 
    Amazon Subscription Boxes
Top subscription boxes – right to your door
PillPack
Pharmacy Simplified
Amazon Renewed
Like-new products
you can trust
   
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads
© 1996-2022, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates